Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree v.11

There are those who argue that the courses of educational institutions should be unpaid for the community organization, especially a charity. It mostly agrees that the viewpoint obviously brings about the advantages to learners. This essay will examine both sides of the arguments and will support why the educational charity should be granted as a people’s need for various students. Either academic skills or vision derives from learning, so the volunteering should be a part of improving the quality of people. Providing the specific skills, possibly teach students in several ways, in fact, it contains the effective method and being professionals. To illustrate, out of proportion the educated people who can efficiently work in their duty, so it contributes to the good standard of civilisation as well. Conversely, there are some identifications that most pupils should learn the academic fields rather than the service of community because the colleges’ applications have high competition. More and more children should not waste their time to educate for being a volunteer. A good illustration for this is that the academic courses are necessary to apply in daily life, such as calculation, and written skill. Due to this reason, this action contains the fundamental ability to children. In conclusion, numerous adolescents should not be taught in unpaid service in during their schooling, as a result, they might have more time to spend the mandatory syllabus even learners lack of practical services for social assistance.