It is argued by some that home teaching is an optimal way of a child's learning, whilst others believe educational institutions are more appropriate for them. This essay will discuss the merits of both sides, then I will elucidate my opinion.
Undoubtedly, learning at home has various benefits for children. Most important of them all is the extreme convenience it provides to both parents and children. At home children can learn in a better way as they do not have to face competition and peer pressure. Parents provide proper attention and spend a quality of time while teaching them at home. For instance, one of my cousins prefers to teach his children at home rather than at school which build strong bonding between them. Hence teaching children at home not only helps to improve their abilities, but also plays an indispensable role in developing relationships with family members.
Nevertheless, schools are the best places to acquire knowledge. Firstly, in school a child learns in a proper environment where they get a chance to deal with different circumstances, such as how to cope with conflicts and confrontations. Similarly, at educational institutions, students learn team working skills which help them to get a job in foreseeable future. Furthermore, schools develop confidence and encourage children to socialize with their peers which consequently develop soft skills to a certain extent. To illustrate, according to a recent report published by BBC Business, this revealed that regular students are more productive and punctual in their practical life.
In conclusion, although both teaching methods have their merits on balance, but I believe schools are far better learning places for children as institutes build confidence and help children to be an active member of the society. Therefore, parents should enrol their children in schools instead of confining them at home.
It
is argued
by
some
that home
teaching
is an optimal way of a child's learning, whilst others believe educational institutions are more appropriate for them. This essay will discuss the merits of both sides, then I will elucidate my opinion.
Undoubtedly
, learning at home has various benefits for
children
. Most
important
of them all is the extreme convenience it provides to both parents and
children
. At home
children
can learn in a better way as they do not
have to
face competition and peer pressure. Parents provide proper attention and spend a quality of time while
teaching
them at home.
For instance
, one of my cousins prefers to teach his
children
at home
rather
than at
school
which build strong bonding between them.
Hence
teaching
children
at home not
only
helps
to
improve
their abilities,
but
also
plays an indispensable role in developing relationships with family members.
Nevertheless
,
schools
are the best places to acquire knowledge.
Firstly
, in
school
a child learns in a proper environment where they
get
a chance to deal with
different
circumstances, such as how to cope with conflicts and confrontations.
Similarly
, at educational institutions, students learn team working
skills
which
help
them to
get
a job in foreseeable future.
Furthermore
,
schools
develop confidence and encourage
children
to socialize with their peers which
consequently
develop soft
skills
to a certain extent. To illustrate, according to a recent report published by BBC Business, this revealed that regular students are more productive and punctual in their practical life.
In conclusion
, although both
teaching
methods have their merits on balance,
but
I believe
schools
are far better learning places for
children
as institutes build confidence and
help
children
to be an active member of the society.
Therefore
, parents should enrol their
children
in
schools
instead
of confining them at home.