Several people are of a viewpoint that the pupils should be taught in their homes for their progress; however, the opponents to this idea think that they should be sent to the school. This essay will discuss how constraint-free learning at homes, and structural teaching at educational institutions are advantageous. In my opinion, the schools do this job better as far as a child's development is concerned.
On the one hand, learning at homes without any strict rules would help in better understanding of concepts by children. It is said that when students are happy, they grasp easily and retain for a long time; therefore, imparting long-lasting knowledge in them will surely benefit in their advancement. For example, a recent study in the UK has found that the educatees who study only at home have better conceptual knowledge than those who studied at the schools.
On the other hand, teaching children at school is the traditional method followed everywhere in the world, and is a crucial factor for the better growth of pupils. Educational institutions have all the facilities that are required for teaching them; moreover, the schools have various teachers who have excellent skills and techniques to teach children in the best possible way. For instance, numerous studies have consistently found that if a child is not enrolled in a school, he or she will not be able to learn other aspects of life properly.
In my opinion, both home and school learning play a vital role in a student's growth. To elaborate more, although the schools hold a higher place for learning, home studying is also necessary. To provide ample evidence, if a child does not do his homework given by the teachers at school, the growth is restricted.
In conclusion, both studying at school and home are essential; nevertheless, school education has more significance than home learning. For overall development, a child should study at school, as well as at home.
Several
people
are of a viewpoint that the pupils should
be taught
in their
homes
for their progress;
however
, the opponents to this
idea
think
that they should be
sent
to the
school
. This essay will discuss how constraint-free
learning
at
homes
, and structural teaching at educational institutions are advantageous. In my opinion, the
schools
do this job
better
as far as a child's development
is concerned
.
On the one hand,
learning
at
homes
without any strict
rules
would
help
in
better
understanding of concepts by children. It
is said
that when students are happy, they grasp
easily
and retain for a long time;
therefore
, imparting long-lasting knowledge in them will
surely
benefit in their advancement.
For example
, a recent
study
in the UK has found that the
educatees
who
study
only
at home have
better
conceptual knowledge than those who studied at the schools.
On the other hand
, teaching children at
school
is the traditional method followed everywhere in the world, and is a crucial factor for the
better
growth of pupils. Educational institutions have all the facilities that
are required
for teaching them;
moreover
, the
schools
have various teachers who have excellent
skills
and techniques to teach children in the best possible way.
For instance
, numerous
studies
have
consistently
found that if a child is not enrolled in a
school
, he or she will not be able to learn other aspects of life
properly
.
In my opinion, both home and
school
learning
play a vital role in a student's growth. To elaborate more, although the
schools
hold a higher place for
learning
, home studying is
also
necessary. To provide ample evidence, if a child does not do his homework
given
by the teachers at
school
, the growth
is restricted
.
In conclusion
, both studying at
school
and home are essential;
nevertheless
,
school
education has more significance than home
learning
. For
overall
development, a child should
study
at
school
,
as well
as at home.