Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people believe that taxing companies, which cause it, is the best way to reduce industrial pollution while some suggest that there are several other ways to solve this trouble. Discuss both the views and give your opinion v.1

Some people believe that taxing companies, which cause it, is the best way to reduce industrial pollution while some suggest that there are several other ways to solve this trouble. 1
Some individuals are of the opinion that industries which cause pollution should be taxed heavily so as to reduce pollution, whereas others opine that pollution should be controlled by other means. This essay intends to discuss both perspectives. I, however, side with the latter view Those who are in favour of taxing companies say so because it is these companies which cause pollution and they should pay for cleaning it up. The ordinary people should not have to pay for it through taxes. Obviously, if government pays for it, it would be through the common man's pocket. On the other hand, other methods to deal with the situation would be better. This is because it would be very difficult to judge which industries are causing how much pollution. They would all shrug off their shoulders and that would make matter worse. Secondly, these companies would claim that they are already paying a lot of taxes and so it becomes the government's responsibility. Other methods should be used to tackle this problem. To begin with, the government can make it mandatory for these industries to set up effluent-treatement plants. Government can also give them subsidies for such projects. This would ensure that these effluents don't contaminate the underground water. These industries should also be encouraged to plant trees. They should have a green belt all around them so that the trees absorb all carbon dioxide liberated To conclude, taxing the industries would not work as a good solution for reducing pollution and other methods should be looked into.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
individuals are of the opinion that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
industries
which cause
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
should
be taxed
heavily
'So as to' expresses purpose and is used in formal texts. Consider using "to"
so as to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
, whereas others opine that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
should
be controlled
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
means. This essay intends to discuss both perspectives. I,
however
, side with the latter view

Those who are in
Possible spelling mistake. 'favour' is British English.
favour
of taxing
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
say
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it is these
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
which cause
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
pollution and
they should pay for cleaning it up. The ordinary
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
should not
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
pay for it through taxes.
Obviously
, if
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
pays for it, it would be through the common
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
man
's pocket.

On the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
hand,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
methods to deal with the situation would be better. This is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it would be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
difficult to judge which
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
industries
are causing how much
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
. They would all shrug off their shoulders and that would
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
matter worse.
Secondly
, these
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
would claim that they are already paying
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
a lot of
taxes and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
it becomes the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
's responsibility.

Other methods should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
to tackle this problem. To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
with, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
it mandatory for these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
industries
to set up
Possible spelling mistake found.
effluent-treatement
plants.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Government
can
also
give them subsidies for such projects. This would ensure that these effluents don't contaminate the underground water. These
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
industries
should
also
be encouraged
to plant trees. They should have a green belt all around them
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
that the trees absorb all carbon dioxide
Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraph
liberated


To conclude
, taxing the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
industries
would not work as a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
solution for reducing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
methods should
be looked
into.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
15Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
5Mistakes
He who knows no foreign languages know nothing of his own.
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

IELTS essay Some people believe that taxing companies, which cause it, is the best way to reduce industrial pollution while some suggest that there are several other ways to solve this trouble. 1

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
257 words
6
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts