One of the most controversial issues today relates to whether or not studying at university after school. Some people think that passing academic lessons will help students to become a useful person in the future while others believe that there are some benefits to getting a job straight after school. In this essay, I am going to examine this question from both points of view, and provide my support for the former view.
On the one side of the argument there are people who argue that the boons of start work straight after school considerably outweigh its drawbacks. The main reason for believing this is that individuals become independent earlier because of start earning money. Moreover when they find an occupation, they will gain more experience in comparison with their peers who commence to work later. People often have this opinion because learning skills can lead them to getting promotions, so that they can settle down earlier such as afford a house or form a family.
On the other hand, it is also possible to make the opposing case. I believe that it is more beneficial for students to continue their studies. Firstly, some jobs require academic qualifications and there is no way to achieve this aim instead of studying at university. Secondly, there are better job opportunities for alumni and because of their certificates they can earn higher salaries. These days the job market has become very competitive and if people do not gain sufficient knowledge they will lose the opportunities. In my opinion, to become a useful person for society, it is crucial to take academic lessons at universities.
By way of conclusion, there are convincing arguments both for and against go to college or work after school, albeit I believe that adolescents are more likely to be successful in their lives if they continue their study beyond school level.
One of the most controversial issues
today
relates to whether or not studying at university after
school
.
Some
people
think
that passing academic lessons will
help
students to
become
a useful person in the future while others believe that there are
some
benefits to getting a
job
straight after
school
. In this essay, I am going to examine this question from both points of view, and provide my support for the former view.
On the one side of the argument there are
people
who argue that the boons of
start
work straight after
school
considerably
outweigh its drawbacks. The main reason for believing this is that individuals
become
independent earlier
because
of
start
earning money.
Moreover
when they find an occupation, they will gain more experience
in comparison
with their peers who commence to work later.
People
often
have this opinion
because
learning
skills
can lead them to getting promotions,
so
that they can settle down earlier such as afford a
house
or form a family.
On the other hand
, it is
also
possible to
make
the opposing case. I believe that it is more beneficial for students to continue their studies.
Firstly
,
some
jobs
require academic qualifications and there is no way to achieve this aim
instead
of studying at university.
Secondly
, there are better
job
opportunities for alumni and
because
of their certificates they can earn higher salaries. These days the
job
market has
become
very
competitive and if
people
do not gain sufficient knowledge they will lose the opportunities. In my opinion, to
become
a useful person for society, it is crucial to take academic lessons at universities.
By way of conclusion, there are convincing arguments both for and against go to college or work after
school
, albeit I believe that adolescents are more likely to be successful in their
lives
if they continue their study beyond
school
level.