In a decade or two, the population has exploded in extreme bad way. Due to this, there is meagre space to live and construction of new houses is crucially needed. The only zone which is left out for making building at outskirt. Few individuals hold views to protect the countryside while others want to make living location outside the city. In my opinion, I agree with the latter said the statement.
First and foremost, People remained in a scanty place to live as the population is increasing drastically. Houses are overcrowded and quality of living is decreasing very rapidly. So the only solution is making homes in the countryside. This is possible, even without damaging an agricultural land. For example, There is a colossal land which remain barren and not of much use for growing crops. Such areas can be overlooked and new building can be established.
Secondly, it becomes senseless to preserve certain landmarks and not using it when we are so short of living space. Rural land definitely presents a heritage value of our ancestors, but the need of time is saving the populace and constructing homes away from cities. We can demarcate valuable properties and make new homes and also use space which is already dilapidated and renovate those places. For instance, In the village, There are houses where no one lives and people have mitigated to cities. These spaces can be used to make homes.
To wrap up, the individuals will have opinions which will be opposed by many, but for me, constructing building at rural is absolutely alright, we live on this planet "Earth" and we have right to live freely in fresh Air, but we should not hamper the Environment in any way.
In a decade or two, the population has exploded in extreme
bad
way. Due to this, there is
meagre
space
to
live
and construction of new
houses
is
crucially
needed. The
only
zone which is
left
out for making building at outskirt. Few individuals hold views to protect the countryside while others want to
make
living location outside the city. In my opinion, I
agree
with the latter said the statement.
First
and foremost,
People
remained in a scanty place to
live
as the population is increasing
drastically
.
Houses
are overcrowded
and quality of living is decreasing
very
rapidly
.
So
the
only
solution is making homes in the countryside. This is possible, even without damaging an agricultural land.
For example
, There is a colossal land which remain barren and not of much
use
for growing crops. Such areas can
be overlooked
and new building can
be established
.
Secondly
, it becomes senseless to preserve certain landmarks and not using it when we are
so
short of living
space
. Rural land definitely presents a heritage value of our ancestors,
but
the need of time is saving the populace and constructing homes away from cities. We can demarcate valuable properties and
make
new homes and
also
use
space
which is already dilapidated and renovate those places.
For instance
, In the village, There are
houses
where no one
lives
and
people
have mitigated to cities. These
spaces
can be
used
to
make
homes.
To wrap up, the individuals will have opinions which will
be opposed
by
many
,
but
for me, constructing building at rural is
absolutely
alright, we
live
on this planet
"
Earth
"
and we have right to
live
freely
in fresh Air,
but
we should not hamper the Environment in any way.