Some people believe that creative artists should have absolute freedom to create their own artwork without any restriction from government. Others believe some form of artifices should not be available to the general public. In this essay, I am going to discuss if creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas without any influence by the government.
I believe artists should have complete freedom on what they would like to create. By limiting what an artist can create, it is limiting their creativity. Art pieces, no matter it is in words, picture, music or film format, enrich people's mind. What makes a human different from an animal is our ability of complex reasoning, using of complex language, and solve complicated problems. Artwork enables us to deliver complex ideas in a form that people can share among people.
However, I also believe not all artwork should be available to the general public. As discussed earlier, artwork enables us to present ideas in a form that people easier share among us. Some people might use this as a medium for propaganda harmful message to the general public. For example, people can create messages to encourage racialism, human slaughtering, sex trafficking or prompting violent. Even though art piece creation should not be restricted by the government, certain arts should be accessible only by certain ages to prevent harmful message delivered to the young generation that might not have enough experience to judge if something is right or wrong.
In conclusion, government should create an atmosphere that allows artists have no restriction on their artwork creation. However, certain art pieces should not be accessible by part of the public. By giving artists sufficient freedom allows them to create any art-pieces as they wish. Limiting the access of such art by ages allows the government creates harmony in our society.
Some
people
believe
that creative
artists
should have absolute
freedom
to
create
their
own
artwork
without any restriction from
government
. Others
believe
some
form of artifices should not be available to the general
public
. In this essay, I am going to discuss if creative
artists
should always be
given
the
freedom
to express their
own
ideas
without any influence by the
government
.
I
believe
artists
should have complete
freedom
on what they would like to
create
. By limiting what an
artist
can
create
, it is limiting their creativity.
Art
pieces, no matter it is in words, picture, music or film format, enrich
people
's mind. What
makes
a human
different
from an animal is our ability of complex reasoning, using of complex language, and solve complicated problems.
Artwork
enables us to deliver complex
ideas
in a form that
people
can share among
people
.
However
, I
also
believe
not all
artwork
should be available to the general
public
. As discussed earlier,
artwork
enables us to present
ideas
in a form that
people
easier share among us.
Some
people
might
use
this as a medium for propaganda harmful message to the general
public
.
For example
,
people
can
create
messages to encourage racialism, human slaughtering, sex trafficking or prompting violent.
Even though
art
piece creation should not
be restricted
by the
government
, certain
arts
should be accessible
only
by certain ages to
prevent
harmful message delivered to the young generation that might not have
enough
experience to judge if something is right or
wrong
.
In conclusion
,
government
should
create
an atmosphere that
allows
artists
have no restriction on their
artwork
creation.
However
, certain
art
pieces should not be accessible by part of the
public
. By giving
artists
sufficient
freedom
allows
them to
create
any art-pieces as they wish. Limiting the access of such
art
by ages
allows
the
government
creates
harmony in our society.