Getting around a city by car or bicycle poses advantages and disadvantages. This essay will examine both before declaring a preference.
There are two obvious benefits to travelling around a city by car. The first is speed. For example, a car can get its driver from one side of a metropolis like New York City to the other in only a few hours. Cars also allow travelers to transport large numbers of items with them, a trait that is very useful to professionals commuting to and from work. These two abilities are simply not possible by bicycle. Thus, there is convincing support for the argument that cars are the optimal vehicle with which to travel around a city.
However, there are nevertheless several advantages to traversing a city by bicycle. For one, unlike a car, a bicycle does not produce harmful emissions, and this is much better for the cleanliness of a city. Bicycles are also small enough to navigate their way between cars, and this means they are less prone to delays due to traffic jams. In addition to this, their small size makes them easier to park, which can significantly reduce transportation related costs in a large city.
This discussion makes clear that both sides of the debate purport valid and convincing arguments that are relevant to the particular needs of the traveller, so it is difficult to declare one form of transport universally better than the other. In my personal case, transit via bicycle is best because I only travel short distances. Both cars and bicycles can be effective methods of city transport given specific circumstances.
Getting around a city by
car
or
bicycle
poses advantages and disadvantages. This essay will examine both
before
declaring a preference.
There are two obvious benefits to travelling around a city by
car
. The
first
is speed
.
For example
, a
car
can
get
its driver from one side of a metropolis like New York City to the other in
only
a few hours.
Cars
also
allow
travelers to transport large numbers of items with them, a trait
that is
very
useful to professionals commuting to and from work. These two abilities are
simply
not possible by
bicycle
.
Thus
, there is convincing support for the argument that
cars
are the optimal vehicle with which to travel around a city.
However
, there are
nevertheless
several advantages to traversing a city by
bicycle
. For one, unlike a
car
, a
bicycle
does not produce harmful emissions, and this is much better for the cleanliness of a city.
Bicycles
are
also
small
enough
to navigate their way between
cars
, and this means they are less prone to delays due to traffic jams.
In addition
to this, their
small
size
makes
them easier to park, which can
significantly
reduce
transportation related costs in a large city.
This discussion
makes
clear
that both sides of the debate purport valid and convincing arguments that are relevant to the particular needs of the
traveller
,
so
it is difficult to declare one form of transport
universally
better than the other. In my personal case, transit via
bicycle
is best
because
I
only
travel short distances. Both
cars
and
bicycles
can be effective methods of city transport
given
specific circumstances.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes