Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature and history of their own country, rather than the literature and history of other countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? v.5

Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature and history of their own country, rather than the literature and history of other countries. v. 5
Teaching young people about literature and past events has been a controversial topic. Several people consider that students should have knowledge about their country’s literature and history instead of others’, whereas others oppose it. From my perspective, although I agree with this, there are also advantages of the opposing view to consider as well, and the reasons for my opinion will be outlined in the following essay. With regard to studying national written works and events in the past, there are plenty of favourable points. The first and most significant one is adolescents are able to understand the content much easier due to the cultures and society they have, which are quite similar to the old times or in the books. With more specificity, in contrast, if the authors mention anything about things that occur in foreign countries, students may require to do extra research which results in a waste of valuable time. Not only this, but they might also have opportunities to receive various advice from their parents because they might have knowledge as a consequence of learning the same history books or read those works of literature before, which would be highly beneficial to students. As a result, their learning might become more effective, which will probably, in turn, augment their grades. Moving to, teaching teenagers the literature and history of other regions, I believe there are fewer benefits in comparison. One of the noticeable ones is youngsters might gain more foreign friends as a consequence of knowing their past incidents or the same writings: namely, novels, poetries and fictions. Moreover, both of them may then share each other interests or beliefs, leading to better relationships between two nations. Furthermore, children can be more omniscient because studying about other countries might lead them to the real world, not just like a frog under a coconut shell. Additionally, they might recognize that their own country is not everything and not all countries are having identical chronicles. They might know about how prosperous countries develop their society and use that knowledge as a guideline purposely to enhance the country they are residing in. In conclusion, it would be more advantageous for children to be knowledgeable about their own country. If the school course managers include related subjects of literature and history of their national land in the curriculum, it will improve the quality of learning, as well as students’ scores. Subsequently, the government and education institutions should collaborate together to make an advancement in the syllabus.
Teaching young
people
about
literature
and past
events
has been a controversial topic. Several
people
consider that
students
should have knowledge about their
country’s
literature
and
history
instead
of others’, whereas others oppose it. From my perspective, although I
agree
with this, there are
also
advantages of the opposing view to consider
as well
, and the reasons for my opinion will
be outlined
in the following essay.

With regard to studying national written works and
events
in the past, there are
plenty
of
favourable
points. The
first
and most significant one is adolescents are able to understand the content much easier due to the cultures and society they have, which are quite similar to the
old
times or in the books. With more specificity,
in contrast
, if the authors mention anything about things that occur in foreign
countries
,
students
may require
to do
extra research which results in a waste of valuable time. Not
only
this,
but
they
might
also
have opportunities to receive various advice from their parents
because
they
might
have knowledge as a consequence of learning the same
history
books or read those works of
literature
before
, which would be
highly
beneficial to
students
.
As a result
, their learning
might
become more effective, which will
probably
, in turn, augment their grades.

Moving to, teaching
teenagers
the
literature
and
history
of
other
regions, I believe there are fewer benefits
in comparison
. One of the noticeable ones is youngsters
might
gain more foreign friends as a consequence of knowing their past incidents or the same writings:
namely
, novels,
poetries
and fictions.
Moreover
, both of them may then share each
other
interests or beliefs, leading to better relationships between two nations.
Furthermore
, children can be more omniscient
because
studying about
other
countries
might
lead them to the real world, not
just
like a frog under a coconut shell.
Additionally
, they
might
recognize that their
own
country
is not everything and not all
countries
are having identical chronicles. They
might
know about how prosperous
countries
develop their society and
use
that knowledge as a guideline
purposely
to enhance the
country
they are residing in.

In conclusion
, it would be more advantageous for children to be knowledgeable about their
own
country
. If the school course managers include related subjects of
literature
and
history
of their national land in the curriculum, it will
improve
the quality of learning,
as well
as
students’
scores.
Subsequently
, the
government
and education institutions should collaborate together to
make
an advancement in the syllabus.
8.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8.5Mistakes

IELTS essay Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature and history of their own country, rather than the literature and history of other countries. v. 5

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
416 words
8.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 8.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 8.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 8.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 8.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts