Communication is a vital process in human interaction and social involvement. While some people believe that physical appearance is more significant than a written approach, others are of a contrary opinion. Personally, I partly agree because both communication methods are prowess in their different uses. This essay will expatiate my reasons in the following paragraphs.
Foremost, exchanging messages physically is more useful during an interactive session. For example, in classrooms, conferences, functions and other social gatherings. As a result, immediate feedback and prompt attention are guaranteed. More so, personal contact is important in order to detect deception. For instance, If a child is being deceived by his mother, it is easily detectable through her facial expressions. Furthermore, a plethora of individuals finds it flexible to express themselves better in the presence of their audience; however, this might be challenging for an introverted personality and could lead to information gap.
Conversely, written transmission has its own beneficial advantages. First of all, it is a veritable means of documentation. For example, job offer letters, certificate and promotion letters. Also, even if superfluous time is invested in writing a piece, the fact that it could be stored and secured for future references, is a plus impact. Additionally, although written documents are useful in theoretical circumstances, such as during exams and report writing; however, they are less powerful in situations like project defence and laboratory experiments.
In conclusion, all types of information transfer means play a significant role in human existence. While the written one is assumed to be more essential by some people, others believe that person to person speech is the most powerful. I believe both are significant in terms of their varying usefulness which include the interactive ability in face to face conversation and documentation advantage in writing down discourse.
Communication is a vital process in human interaction and social involvement. While
some
people
believe that physical appearance is more significant than a
written
approach, others are of a contrary opinion.
Personally
, I partly
agree
because
both communication methods are prowess in their
different
uses
. This essay will expatiate my reasons in the following paragraphs.
Foremost, exchanging messages
physically
is more useful during an interactive session.
For example
, in classrooms, conferences, functions and other social gatherings.
As a result
, immediate feedback and prompt attention
are guaranteed
. More
so
, personal contact is
important
in order to detect deception.
For instance
, If a child is
being deceived
by his mother, it is
easily
detectable through her facial expressions.
Furthermore
, a plethora of individuals finds it flexible to express themselves better in the presence of their audience;
however
, this might be challenging for an introverted personality and could lead to information gap.
Conversely
,
written
transmission has its
own
beneficial advantages.
First of all
, it is a veritable means of documentation.
For example
, job offer letters, certificate and promotion letters.
Also
, even if superfluous time
is invested
in writing a piece, the fact that it could
be stored
and secured for future references, is a plus impact.
Additionally
, although
written
documents are useful in theoretical circumstances, such as during exams and report writing;
however
, they are less powerful in situations like project
defence
and laboratory experiments.
In conclusion
, all types of information transfer means play a significant role in human existence. While the
written
one
is assumed
to be more essential by
some
people
, others believe that person to person speech is the most powerful. I believe both are significant in terms of their varying usefulness which include the interactive ability in face to face conversation and documentation advantage in writing down discourse.