Some people think that scholastic achievement is based upon qualified mentors while others think it is derived from individual efforts. In this essay, I am going to examine both points of view and then give my perspective on the matter.
On one side of the arguments, there are some people who argue the benefits of qualified instructors considerably outweigh individual efforts. The main reason for believing this is that satisfactory teachers know where to focus on learning in the short term to get the best result. It is also possible to say they can provide the most effective comprehension for students in some fields. A good illustration of this is when I studied English in South Korea, good teachers always emphasized the importance of having actual English conversations than reading grammar books.
On the other hand, it is also possible to make the opposing case. It is often argued that in fact, people can be successful by studying themselves. People often believe this opinion because they believe students must stand themselves in the long run even though they started learning theory with a bit of help. A second point is that there have been no always good teachers for everyone. A particularly good example here is that the director who nurtured a world-class footballer might be the worst for other footballers.
In conclusion, I believe both arguments have their merits. On balance, however, I feel that individual efforts are more demanding than being taught by great teachers because students can make a difference themselves and 'good' mentors cannot be 'good' for everyone. Given this situation, it is recommendable for students to have a regular self-education time every day, thinking of what methods can be the best suited to them.
Some
people
think
that scholastic achievement
is based
upon qualified mentors while others
think
it
is derived
from individual efforts. In this essay, I am going to examine both points of view and then give my perspective on the matter.
On one side of the arguments, there are
some
people
who argue the benefits of qualified instructors
considerably
outweigh individual efforts. The main reason for believing this is that satisfactory
teachers
know where to focus on learning in the short term to
get
the best result. It is
also
possible to say they can provide the most effective comprehension for
students
in
some
fields. A
good
illustration of this is when I studied English in South Korea,
good
teachers
always emphasized the importance of having actual English conversations than reading grammar books.
On the other hand
, it is
also
possible to
make
the opposing case. It is
often
argued that in fact,
people
can be successful by studying themselves.
People
often
believe this opinion
because
they believe
students
must
stand themselves in the long run
even though
they
started
learning theory with a bit of
help
. A second point is that there have been no always
good
teachers
for everyone. A
particularly
good
example here is that the director who nurtured a world-
class
footballer might be the worst for other footballers.
In conclusion
, I believe both arguments have their merits. On balance,
however
, I feel that individual efforts are more demanding than
being taught
by great
teachers
because
students
can
make
a difference themselves and '
good
' mentors cannot be '
good
' for everyone.
Given
this situation, it is recommendable for
students
to have a regular self-education time every day, thinking of what methods can be the best suited to them.