Today, it is important to note that the public has a growing appetite for different content areas of news. Amongst these contents, celebrity news is of high entertainment value to many individuals. However, no one would ever want their personal life to make the front-page headlines. Hence, it seems to be inappropriate for the media to publish this kind of private information freely.
The mass media play a crucial role in promoting the exposure of celebrities, and this can lead to stardom becoming a sought-after status. For instance, press coverage of the famous people’s lives can pave the way for admirers follow the footsteps of their favourite star. Idolizing successful people encourages juveniles to play to their strength to attain prosperity in real life. Another benefit is that celebrities can attract good publicity through the means of mass media coverage.
While many people aspire to achieve fame, the celebrity lifestyle is not without its drawbacks. Suffering from a life in the public eye is a clear indication of the associated disadvantages. But the symbiotic relationship between the media and celebrities cannot be overlooked, which means that they both depend on each other for existence and survival. Although, this fact should not be deemed as a justification for publishing unwelcome personal matters. The persistence of press attention from the likes of paparazzi is a clear example of privacy invasion. Therefore, governments should take strict actions against the channels which are not operating in a moral framework.
In the light of aforesaid factors, it is clear that the merits cannot outweigh the negatives of breaching the personal space. In my viewpoint, the best approach would be government interference to create a safe environment for both parties.
Today
, it is
important
to note that the public has a growing appetite for
different
content areas of news. Amongst these contents,
celebrity
news is of high entertainment value to
many
individuals.
However
, no one would ever want their personal life to
make
the front-page headlines.
Hence
, it seems to be inappropriate for the
media
to publish this kind of private information
freely
.
The mass
media
play a crucial role in promoting the exposure of
celebrities
, and this can lead to stardom becoming a sought-after status.
For instance
, press coverage of the
famous
people
’s
lives
can pave the way for admirers follow the footsteps of their
favourite
star. Idolizing successful
people
encourages
juveniles to play to their strength to attain prosperity in real life. Another benefit is that
celebrities
can attract
good
publicity through the means of mass
media
coverage.
While
many
people
aspire to achieve fame, the
celebrity
lifestyle is not without its drawbacks. Suffering from a life in the public eye is a
clear
indication of the associated disadvantages.
But
the symbiotic relationship between the
media
and
celebrities
cannot
be overlooked
, which means that they both depend on each other for existence and survival. Although, this fact should not
be deemed
as a justification for publishing unwelcome personal matters. The persistence of press attention from the likes of paparazzi is a
clear
example of privacy invasion.
Therefore
,
governments
should take strict actions against the channels which are not operating in a moral framework.
In the light of aforesaid factors, it is
clear
that the merits cannot outweigh the negatives of breaching the personal space. In my viewpoint, the best approach would be
government
interference to create a safe environment for both parties.