Nowadays many parents often wonder if they should allow their children to stay at home until they are old enough to study at primary school or let them go to school as soon as impossible. Whereas, I would argue that sending children to school as early is the best choice.
On the one hand, the children who allowed to stay at home have a big amount of time to gain physical development. The reason can be put forward to explain this phenomenal that they don’t have to catch up with the lectures at the school as well as be anxious due to continuous assessment or exams. In Finland which has been known as the best academic education country, the inhabitants are famous for maxims such as “ Let the children be themselves” or “ The children’s business is playing and playing”. Moreover, if the student are not be obliged to go to school early, they can learn a lot in the school of hard knocks or improve society skills such as communicate skill which schools never teach them.
On the other hand, it seems to me that letting the children attend to school early is essential. First, they decrease the over-dependence on their parents because their parents are not able to be with them high and low to look after them, they have to prepare almost things they need such as books or breakfast. Secondly, such children can have the capability of having a good grasp of curriculum and pass the formal examination easily than others who stayed at home for ages, since these students have been exposed to studying for a long time which creates a good studying habit.
In conclusion, while allowing the children to stay at home does have some benefits, it seems to me that the advantages of a early education for children is a better choice.
Nowadays
many
parents
often
wonder if they should
allow
their
children
to stay at home until they are
old
enough
to study at primary
school
or
let
them go to
school
as
soon
as impossible. Whereas, I would argue that sending
children
to
school
as
early
is the best choice.
On the one hand, the
children
who
allowed
to stay at home have a
big
amount of time to gain physical development. The reason can
be put
forward to
explain
this phenomenal that they don’t
have to
catch up with the lectures at the
school
as well
as be anxious due to continuous assessment or exams. In Finland which has
been known
as the best academic education country, the inhabitants are
famous
for maxims such as
“
Let
the
children
be themselves” or
“
The
children’s
business is playing and playing”.
Moreover
, if the student are not
be obliged
to go to
school
early
, they can learn a lot in the
school
of
hard
knocks or
improve
society
skills
such as communicate
skill
which
schools
never teach them.
On the other hand
, it seems to me that letting the
children
attend to
school
early
is essential.
First
, they decrease the over-dependence on their parents
because
their parents are not able to be with them high and low to look after them, they
have to
prepare almost things they need such as books or breakfast.
Secondly
, such
children
can have the capability of having a
good
grasp of curriculum and pass the formal examination
easily
than others who stayed at home for ages, since these students have
been exposed
to studying for a long time which creates a
good
studying habit.
In conclusion
, while allowing the
children
to stay at home does have
some
benefits, it seems to me that the advantages of
a
early
education for
children
is a better choice.