A number of people think that longer sentences can help reduce the crime rate. However, this issue is not straightforward and arguments can be made against the idea. This essay will discuss the debate and give a concluding view.
On the one hand, those who support the longer penalties such as life in a prison for years cite the various benefits. These range from the decrease in the crime rate to gaining the social safety. In order to reduce the crime rate, criminals particularly murderers should be punished by the severest and the longest sentences. Due to the fact that they can realize serious consequences of their fault. If criminals do not accept the longer sentences, they will commit their errors in different ways. In addition, another argument is that living in the safe society is a real right for people. If governments did not consider tough punishments to criminals, the crime rate would increase in societies. Thus, individuals will have to live in an unsafe society in which everyone could permit yourself to do anything wrong without considering others.
By contrast, the opponents of the view point that there are a lot of alternative approaches by which states could punish the criminals. This group believes that living in prison, for instance, can be enough beneficial neither the societies nor the criminals. Indeed, states should employ the criminals to do some activities which can be helpful to people. For example, there is a wide range of community services that can be considered as the effective sentences. These types of punishments are useful not only to people or governments but also to the criminals. On the other words, the criminals could learn how it is possible to be useful to their societies.
On balance, although considering longer sentences may be required in some cases, it seems obvious that these kinds of penalties cannot have positive effects on both the crime rate and making changes into the criminals' attitude.
A number of
people
think
that
longer
sentences
can
help
reduce
the
crime
rate
.
However
, this issue is not straightforward and arguments can
be made
against the
idea
. This essay will discuss the debate and give a concluding view.
On the one hand, those who support the
longer
penalties such as life in a prison for years cite the various benefits. These range from the decrease in the
crime
rate
to gaining the social safety. In order to
reduce
the
crime
rate
,
criminals
particularly
murderers should
be punished
by the severest and the longest
sentences
. Due to the fact that they can realize serious consequences of their fault. If
criminals
do not accept the
longer
sentences
, they will commit their errors in
different
ways.
In addition
, another argument is that living in the safe
society
is a real right for
people
. If
governments
did not consider tough punishments to
criminals
, the
crime
rate
would increase in
societies
.
Thus
, individuals will
have to
live
in an unsafe
society
in which everyone could permit yourself to do anything
wrong
without considering others.
By contrast, the opponents of the view point that there are
a lot of
alternative approaches by which states could punish the
criminals
. This group believes that living in prison,
for instance
, can be
enough
beneficial neither the
societies
nor the
criminals
.
Indeed
, states should employ the
criminals
to do
some
activities which can be helpful to
people
.
For example
, there is a wide range of community services that can
be considered
as the effective
sentences
. These types of punishments are useful not
only
to
people
or
governments
but
also
to the
criminals
. On the other words, the
criminals
could learn how it is possible to be useful to their societies.
On balance, although considering
longer
sentences
may
be required
in
some
cases, it seems obvious that these kinds of penalties cannot have
positive
effects on both the
crime
rate
and making
changes
into the
criminals&
#039; attitude.