Some people think charity organisations must only help their nation. Meanwhile others believe that these charity assemblies should offer assistance to necessitous people regardless of where they live. I concur this view as it assists all needy individuals without any discrimination.
On the one hand, many people believe that charity institutions have to support their own country and they claim this by helping another indigent nation. However, they may encourage it to develop a dependency on aid rather than solve their problem. In other words, they are training it to tackle their domestic issue. As the past has shown, some countries started to depend on aids they got from charities such as Somalia. Although it is true, I still believe that the assistances should not grant indigenous. Regarding the supports, they can be given in the form of training of how to fix their troubles.
On the other hand, others reckon that the help has to be given to pauper individuals despite where they are. Through funding the impecunious country, wealthy countries gain benefits. For instance, the United Arab Emirates has been investigating in many developing countries such as Sudan, and due to this investment, it increases economic growth. That is the reason why I side with this opinion as both countries earn interest from the assistance.
To sum up, charity institutions ought to assist impoverished people without any segregation and solve the negative effect that can develop from it as the dependency relying on aids; also through sage funding, both nations gain profit.
Some
people
think
charity
organisations
must
only
help
their nation.
Meanwhile
others believe that these
charity
assemblies should offer assistance to necessitous
people
regardless of where they
live
. I concur this view as it assists all needy individuals without any discrimination.
On the one hand,
many
people
believe that
charity
institutions
have to
support their
own
country and
they claim this by helping another indigent nation.
However
, they may encourage it to develop a dependency on aid
rather
than solve their problem. In
other
words, they are training it to tackle their domestic issue. As the past has shown,
some
countries
started
to depend on aids they
got
from
charities
such as Somalia. Although it is true, I
still
believe that the
assistances
should not grant indigenous. Regarding the supports, they can be
given
in the form of training of how to
fix
their troubles.
On the
other
hand, others reckon that the
help
has to
be
given
to pauper individuals despite where they are. Through funding the impecunious
country
, wealthy
countries
gain benefits.
For instance
, the United Arab Emirates has been investigating in
many
developing
countries
such as Sudan, and due to this investment, it increases economic growth.
That is
the reason why I side with this opinion as both
countries
earn interest from the assistance.
To sum up,
charity
institutions ought to assist impoverished
people
without any segregation and solve the
negative
effect that can develop from it as the dependency relying on aids;
also
through sage funding, both nations gain profit.