Some people are of the opinion that the government should stop funding artwork such as painting and music as these are not a proper use of the money, but instead they should allocate this money into other services that will benefit the people. From my point of view, I completely agree with this notion as this will discourage teenagers from dropping out of school and also improve the infrastructure of the communities.
To begin with, there are quite a large number of musicians and artist in every community and spending more money in this sector will have a detrimental effect on the citizens particularly the youngsters. In other words, teenagers are being drawn into the music instead of focusing on their education and as a result of this they are leaving school to become a musician. The government will be encouraging children to drop out of school if they continue to fund them. For example, Norway now has the highest rate of teenage school drop out because their government issuing loans to students who wants to become and artist.
On the other hand, a better way to utilize this money will be to improve the infrastructure of the country. That is to say, building more roads, hospitals, companies and airports will bring more benefit than using them in the art sector. Firstly, this will create a lot of jobs for people, thus reducing crime rates and unemployment. Secondly, it will generate more income for the government, which can be used for the development of other things in a country. Furthermore, good roads will decrease the rate of road accident, thereby increasing the life expectancy.
To conclude, certain numbers of individuals feel that spending money into entertainments like making music and colouring drawings are not a good use of government money and therefore the money should go into the development of better infrastructure.
Some
people
are of the opinion that the
government
should
stop
funding artwork such as painting and music as these are not a proper
use
of the
money
,
but
instead
they should allocate this
money
into
other
services that will benefit the
people
. From my point of view, I completely
agree
with this notion as this will discourage
teenagers
from dropping out of
school
and
also
improve
the infrastructure of the communities.
To
begin
with, there are quite
a large number of
musicians and artist in every community and spending more
money
in this sector will have a detrimental effect on the citizens
particularly
the youngsters. In
other
words,
teenagers
are
being drawn
into the music
instead
of focusing on their education and
as a result
of this they are leaving
school
to become a musician. The
government
will be encouraging children to drop out of
school
if they continue to fund them.
For example
, Norway
now
has the highest rate of teenage
school
drop out
because
their
government
issuing loans to students who
wants
to become and artist.
On the
other
hand, a better way to utilize this
money
will be to
improve
the infrastructure of the country.
That is
to say, building more roads, hospitals,
companies
and airports will bring more benefit than using them in the art sector.
Firstly
, this will create
a lot of
jobs for
people
,
thus
reducing crime rates and unemployment.
Secondly
, it will generate more income for the
government
, which can be
used
for the development of
other
things in a country.
Furthermore
,
good
roads will decrease the rate of road accident, thereby increasing the life expectancy.
To conclude
, certain numbers of individuals feel that spending
money
into entertainments like making music and
colouring
drawings are not a
good
use
of
government
money
and
therefore
the
money
should go into the development of better infrastructure.