The numbers of criminals have been increasing for a long period. While some lawyers and politicians believe that death penalty is the strict rule to prevent future cases, some activists argue that it should be non-negotiable to discuss a person’s life even if they are violent criminals. This essay will highlight both arguments which have proven pros and cons.
First of all, the governments issue a law to decrease the ratio of crimes, however, it has been seen that the number of cases has been increasing. That’s the reason why politicians support the death penalty. In fact, if some concrete punishments like the death penalty come into operation, it is believed that violations could become less. Moreover, due to the high volume of prisoners, the jails are working with almost full capacity. So, the governments have to build more prison around the country, and it causes a high financial burden for every citizen. For instance, if the death penalty becomes legal and protected by laws, there would be more space for criminals, so governments do not oblige to construct new facilities.
On the other hand, in this contemporary world, human rights have become crucial for all societies. Developed countries have been issuing laws to protect people’s lives in line with human rights. Moreover, according to the Human Rights Declaration, every member of the united union has to follow the rules in line with the clauses of the agreement. If a country makes death penalty legal, it would be faced with some restrictions from other members. Furthermore, it should not be forgotten that every person has a family or friends. Instead of killing people, lawmakers should consider the negative impacts on society and future generations. For instance, if a father is punished by the death penalty, what will his children do? Most importantly, nobody can guarantee that the psychology of the children would not be affected.
In conclusion, in the light of information given above, even if there are minor advantages, mostly regarding finances, every community should follow the human rights and act in line with the human rights declaration to not come across significant drawbacks in the future.
The numbers of criminals have been increasing for a long period. While
some
lawyers and politicians believe that death
penalty
is the strict
rule
to
prevent
future cases,
some
activists argue that it should be non-negotiable to discuss a person’s life even if they are violent criminals. This essay will highlight both arguments which have proven pros and cons.
First of all
, the
governments
issue a law to decrease the ratio of crimes,
however
, it has been
seen
that the number of cases has been increasing. That’s the reason why politicians support the death
penalty
. In fact, if
some
concrete punishments like the death
penalty
come
into operation, it
is believed
that violations could become less.
Moreover
, due to the high volume of prisoners, the jails are working with almost full capacity.
So
, the
governments
have to
build more prison around the country, and it causes a high financial burden for every citizen.
For instance
, if the death
penalty
becomes legal and protected by laws, there would be more space for criminals,
so
governments
do not oblige to construct new facilities.
On the other hand
, in this contemporary world,
human
rights
have become crucial for all societies.
Developed countries
have been issuing laws to protect
people
’s
lives
in line with
human
rights
.
Moreover
, according to the
Human
Rights
Declaration, every member of the united union
has to
follow the
rules
in line with the clauses of the agreement. If a country
makes
death
penalty
legal, it would
be faced
with
some
restrictions from other members.
Furthermore
, it should not
be forgotten
that every person has a family or friends.
Instead
of killing
people
, lawmakers should consider the
negative
impacts on society and future generations.
For instance
, if a father
is punished
by the death
penalty
, what will his children do? Most
importantly
, nobody can guarantee that the psychology of the children would not be
affected
.
In conclusion
, in the light of information
given
above, even if there are minor advantages,
mostly
regarding finances, every community should follow the
human
rights
and act in line with the
human
rights
declaration to not
come
across significant drawbacks in the future.