Several people believe that international tourist should be paying more Money than natives. When they visit important sites of the country. I do not agree with this idea and believe that charges should be exactly the same.
From a context, it might seem logical to charge foreign tourists more to enter the traditional and cultural place. As most of those historical shrines and monuments are government authorities and they collect money as tax from local residents. From this regard, many of them feel that local residents are already paying a portion of ticket money as tax to the government. However, this is a very narrowed view and this rule dissatisfy the tourists as many of them feel it as discrimination. Collecting an extra charge from the outside people is a shortsighted step.
Furthermore, in other hand, satisfied tourists encourage their friends and family to holiday the places, and increases in the number of visitors simultaneously raise the income of a country. Meanwhile, if those travellers feel unhappy due to paying an extra penny than locals, leads to share their dissatisfaction with other foreign tourists. For instance, many picturesque sceneries and breathtaking views are asked to pay extra tax for international visitors, Thus it hesitates them to visit certain places. Though, it strongly effect on the income sources of provincial. Moreover, it would be tough for the authority to maintain those important places. From this aspect, having an equal entrance fee has a better impact.
To conclude, from a broader viewpoint, having the same ticket fee, both for the residents and foreign tourists, to allow the entrance to any nationally and historically important place, including a museum, park and historical places is more effective and I completely agree that the fee should not be different.
Several
people
believe that international
tourist
should be paying more Money than natives.
When
they visit
important
sites of the country. I do not
agree
with this
idea
and believe that charges should be exactly the same.
From a context, it might seem logical to charge foreign
tourists
more to enter the traditional and cultural
place
. As most of those historical shrines and monuments are
government
authorities and
they collect money as tax from local residents. From this regard,
many
of them feel that local residents are already paying a portion of ticket money as tax to the
government
.
However
, this is a
very
narrowed view and this
rule
dissatisfy the
tourists
as
many
of them feel it as discrimination. Collecting an extra charge from the outside
people
is
a shortsighted step.
Furthermore
, in other hand, satisfied
tourists
encourage their friends and family to holiday the
places
, and increases in the number of visitors
simultaneously
raise the income of a country. Meanwhile, if those
travellers
feel unhappy due to paying an extra penny than locals, leads to share their dissatisfaction with other foreign
tourists
.
For instance
,
many
picturesque sceneries and breathtaking views
are asked
to pay extra tax for international visitors,
Thus
it hesitates them to visit certain
places
.
Though
, it
strongly
effect
on the income sources of provincial.
Moreover
, it would be tough for the authority to maintain those
important
places
. From this aspect, having an equal entrance fee has a better impact.
To conclude
, from a broader viewpoint, having the same ticket fee, both for the residents and foreign
tourists
, to
allow
the entrance to any
nationally
and
historically
important
place
, including a museum, park and historical
places
is more effective and I completely
agree
that the fee should not be
different
.