In the contemporary world, peoples' lives are progressed pursuant to the changes that globalisation brings to the society. Popular western cultures have altered the overall linguistic practice around the globe, establishing English as a dominant language while leaving other minor languages in threat. Some argue that such a trend can allow global citizens to achieve harmony through destructing a communicational barrier while others state the opposite opinion. These two divergent ideas will be analysed in the following paragraphs, supported by relevant examples.
Having English as a common language can ease possible difficulties arisen by language barriers. One can readily recount incidences of people having conversational problems when travelling overseas. Not being able to understand foreign languages disable people from comprehending foreigners' thoughts and bonding with them. Consequentially, this may cause some to develop biased or negative perceptions of people from other countries. Therefore, if the citizens of the world could speak one or fewer languages, troubles generated by language barriers would be minimised and create a harmonious society.
However, the disappearance of a language may result in a loss of a nation's cultural identity. Languages do not only represent verbal practice by humans but also reflect on a country's traditions. For example, the Korean language includes two different ways of expressing words depending on which age group one belongs to. If such as a linguistically diversified activity was to be replaced by English, the nation would lose its historical custom that had been maintained for centuries.
In conclusion, the aforementioned ideas suggest two varying opinions about having fewer languages in the world. I personally believe that every language should be preserved to keep its individual identity and characteristics.
In the contemporary world, peoples'
lives
are progressed
pursuant to the
changes
that
globalisation
brings to the society. Popular western cultures have altered the
overall
linguistic practice around the globe, establishing English as a dominant
language
while leaving other minor
languages
in threat.
Some
argue that such a trend can
allow
global citizens to achieve harmony through destructing a
communicational
barrier while others state the opposite opinion. These two divergent
ideas
will be
analysed
in the following paragraphs, supported by relevant examples.
Having English as a common
language
can
ease
possible difficulties arisen by
language
barriers. One can
readily
recount incidences of
people
having conversational problems when travelling overseas. Not being able to understand foreign
languages
disable
people
from comprehending foreigners' thoughts and bonding with them.
Consequentially
, this may cause
some
to develop biased or
negative
perceptions of
people
from other countries.
Therefore
, if the citizens of the world could speak one or fewer
languages
, troubles generated by
language
barriers would be
minimised
and create a harmonious society.
However
, the disappearance of a
language
may result in a loss of a nation's cultural identity.
Languages
do not
only
represent verbal practice by humans
but
also
reflect on a country's traditions.
For example
, the Korean
language
includes two
different
ways of expressing words depending on which age group one belongs to. If such as a
linguistically
diversified activity was to
be replaced
by English, the nation would lose its historical custom that had
been maintained
for centuries.
In conclusion
, the aforementioned
ideas
suggest two varying opinions about having fewer
languages
in the world. I
personally
believe that every
language
should
be preserved
to
keep
its individual identity and characteristics.