More and more people are allowed to access to the mass media. Some argue that there are should not any obstackles for obtaining information, also nobody chases the activity of people such as what they are reading, watching and so on through Internet. Should government perform efforts against freedom of society or ignore this risk? I can see both sides of this argument, and in this essay I will give my opinion and some examples.
Generally, people in last centure were as reserved as today. Due to the development of technologies, a plethora of people have access to the newspapers, TV and Internet. The influences to most of them could be not only positive, but also negative. Officials do not let citizens have free access to malicious information. As a result, there is a likelihood that they would be as members of terrorist' s groups. Therefore, special agencies could estimate safety in advance.
In contrast, in many countries have been blocked a majority of information source in order to conserve people from absurd idea. However, they could not totally prohibit it, as external hackers tend to find solution for any issue. If government forbid aspects which is used by people they might worse the situation. Despite this, most expert groups suggest that people should be taught what is right or wrong instead of blocking the sources.
In conclusion, mass media such as TV, newspapers and Internet could be controlled by government. Nonetheless, citizens should be allowed to use the technology freely. I believe that people would have permission to all of media and nobody follows them.
More and more
people
are
allowed
to access to the mass media.
Some
argue that there are should not any
obstackles
for obtaining information,
also
nobody chases the activity of
people
such as what they are reading, watching and
so
on through Internet. Should
government
perform efforts against freedom of society or
ignore
this
risk
? I can
see
both sides of this argument, and in this essay I will give my opinion and
some
examples.
Generally
,
people
in last
centure
were as reserved as
today
. Due to the development of technologies, a plethora of
people
have access to the newspapers, TV and Internet. The influences to most of them could be not
only
positive
,
but
also
negative
. Officials do not
let
citizens have free access to malicious information.
As a result
, there is a likelihood that they would be as members of
terrorist&
#039; s groups.
Therefore
, special agencies could estimate safety in advance.
In contrast
, in
many
countries have
been blocked
a majority of information source in order to conserve
people
from absurd
idea
.
However
, they could not
totally
prohibit it, as external hackers tend to find solution for any issue.
If
government
forbid aspects which is
used
by
people
they might worse the situation. Despite this, most expert groups suggest that
people
should
be taught
what is right or
wrong
instead
of blocking the sources.
In conclusion
, mass media such as TV, newspapers and Internet could
be controlled
by
government
. Nonetheless, citizens should be
allowed
to
use
the technology
freely
. I believe that
people
would have permission to
all of media
and nobody follows them.