Nowadays, more and more countries are avoiding from death penalty for criminals. Last decades, there were a high percentage of murderer numbers who is in prison. Some argue that society will be guilty as criminals if murderers are penalized with the corporal punishment and it would be better when murderers in prison for a life. I partially agree with this opinion and in this essay I will show both side of argument and give examples.
In general, into United Nations Organization has a Human Rights department. It can be seen that most of country in the world already have enrolled to this organization. If country the member of this organization, they should obey to their rules whereas some countries punish murderers by killing them. Also people have their own rights and the government should respect them and on trial judges and juries have to take into account. I totally agree with point because of law works for everyone equally.
Turning to the other side of argument, in many cases murderers have adequate barrister and he might be innocent on trial and someone condemn them unfairly. Consequently, murderer will do his activity again and again. I partially disagree to decision for a life prison to all murderers. That’s why for serial murderer who committed a crime frequently the government should apply a death because they never be rehabilitated in prison.
To sum up, giving punishment to murderers cannot be easy as well. There should be taken all factor to perform victim whether the murderer lives or not. It has both pros and cons decision, by the way people should be more merciful to criminals. I believe that murderers get suitable punishment for their guilts.
Nowadays, more and more
countries
are avoiding from death penalty for criminals. Last decades, there were a high percentage of
murderer
numbers who is in prison.
Some
argue that society will be guilty as criminals if
murderers
are penalized
with the corporal punishment and it would be better when
murderers
in prison for a life. I
partially
agree
with this opinion and in this essay I will
show
both side of argument and give examples.
In general
, into United Nations Organization has a Human Rights department. It can be
seen
that most of
country
in the world already have enrolled to this organization. If
country
the member of this organization, they should obey to their
rules
whereas
some
countries
punish
murderers
by killing them.
Also
people
have their
own
rights and the
government
should respect them and on trial judges and juries
have to
take into account. I
totally
agree
with point
because
of law works for everyone
equally
.
Turning to the other side of argument, in
many
cases
murderers
have adequate
barrister and
he might be innocent on trial and someone
condemn
them
unfairly
.
Consequently
,
murderer
will do his activity again and again. I
partially
disagree to decision for a life prison to all
murderers
. That’s why for serial
murderer
who committed a crime
frequently
the
government
should apply a death
because
they never
be rehabilitated
in prison.
To sum up, giving punishment to
murderers
cannot be easy
as well
. There should
be taken
all factor to perform victim whether the
murderer
lives
or not. It has both pros and cons decision, by the way
people
should be more merciful to criminals. I believe that
murderers
get
suitable punishment for their
guilts
.