Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contributions to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others. To what extent is this style of management effective? Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard? v.1

Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contributions to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others. Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard? v. 1
Chairpersons of the companies are using a massive number of methods to motivate their employees to achieve the organizational missions by providing them financial rewards. Firstly, this essay will outline the possible consequences of discriminating management and will recommend a more powerful method - the competitive environment to motivate personnel to work hard. On the one point, giving financial bonuses for only the part of the staff members also would discourage others. If, for instance, employers provide any additional payment for those workers who exhibit an incredible output, as a result, it will lessen the performance review and appraisals of others. In addition, those people will have a sense of discrimination which then can end with a propensity to superficial for the organizational mission and reluctant for career progression. Some research papers, including the paper of “Fairy Labour in the 21st century” claim that discriminating management in the workforce has a weird impact not only in the company but also in society. Accordingly, this type of practices should be removed from the organization`s agenda. From another point of view, company leaders have to create a competitive environment among the staff members in order to measure the softly-walking development. In comparison with discriminating management, it has effective outcomes because it provides a variety of rewards excluding money, such as a perk, a free lounge, and a travel ticket or monthly awards for hard workers and day release programmes. Undoubtedly, companies working in this motivational way, as soon as possible will improve target-related job satisfaction and performance reviews. For example, YARAT Contemporary Art Space annually gives a chance for hard-working employees to get professional courses or international travel which contributed them to develop the range of projects in the cultural education sector. So, it clears that money is not always as successful as our needs. To summarize, in order to improve company satisfaction, employers have various creative method chooses to encourage the workers for extraordinary contributions and sustainable productivity. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of rewarding an employee completely by non-financial awards would be supportive. After a thorough analysis, the subject supports that the general requirements have more beneficial effects than the unequal behaviour over the personnel.
Chairpersons of the
companies
are using a massive number of methods to motivate their employees to achieve the organizational missions by providing them financial rewards.
Firstly
, this essay will outline the possible consequences of discriminating management and will recommend a more powerful method
-
the competitive environment to motivate personnel to work
hard
.

On the one point, giving financial bonuses for
only
the part of the staff members
also
would discourage others. If,
for instance
, employers provide any additional payment for those workers who exhibit an incredible output,
as a result
, it will lessen the performance review and appraisals of others.
In addition
, those
people
will have a sense of discrimination which then can
end
with a propensity to superficial for the organizational mission and reluctant for career progression.
Some
research papers, including the paper of “Fairy
Labour
in the 21st century” claim that discriminating management in the workforce has a weird impact not
only
in the
company
but
also
in society.
Accordingly
, this type of practices should
be removed
from the
organization`s
agenda.

From another point of view,
company
leaders
have to
create a competitive environment among the staff members in order to measure the
softly
-walking development.
In comparison
with discriminating management, it has effective outcomes
because
it provides a variety of rewards excluding money, such as a perk, a free lounge, and a travel ticket or monthly awards for
hard
workers and day release
programmes
.
Undoubtedly
,
companies
working in this motivational way, as
soon
as possible will
improve
target-related job satisfaction and performance reviews.
For example
,
YARAT
Contemporary Art Space
annually
gives a chance for
hard
-working employees to
get
professional courses or international travel which contributed them to develop the range of projects in the cultural education sector.
So
, it clears that money is not always as successful as our needs.

To summarize
, in order to
improve
company
satisfaction, employers have various creative method chooses to encourage the workers for extraordinary contributions and sustainable productivity.
Therefore
, it is
clear
that the
idea
of rewarding an employee completely by non-financial awards would be supportive. After a thorough analysis, the subject supports that the general requirements have more beneficial effects than the unequal
behaviour
over the personnel.
8.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8.5Mistakes

IELTS essay Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contributions to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others. Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard? v. 1

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
367 words
8.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 8.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 8.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 8.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 8.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts