Modernization of cities requires more high tech buildings with advance designs and there are many arguments regarding their construction layout. Some individuals hold the view that power should manage the criteria of pattern, but some oppose that by saying that finance committee should be given priority to choose a picture. Nothing can be concluded before a solid discussion of both views and this essay is going to put some light on these topics in the upcoming paragraphs.
Construction of scheme of buildings should be controlled by the union, first view says. Definitely, officials are the leaders and nothing can be drawn without their decision.
So they should be given the upper hand to select the designs of buildings as they have highly educated engineers and these workers have the skills and can properly evaluate whether or not the designs are good according to the climate, wind speed, population accommodation and the problems arising from the designs. Also, to ensure safety of mass public because many financial personalities owning the building ignore such aspects to make more profit, state should be given priority for the designs as officials can check that whether the designs are good for everyone or not.
But, latter view suggests that the person who provides money for construction should have the right to make or reject the designs. These persons know their financial horizons and so that is why they can choose an appropriate construction suitable for their economic aspects. If designs cost more, they can change it because they cannot go beyond a certain financial limit. For example, the architecture of Burj Khalifa was selected by the makers of the building because it was a mega million project. So financial personalities can also select designs that suit them.
Taking everything into account, I think that authority should be given priority to select designs as they select it by keeping in mind many aspects influenced by designs and the problems arising.
Modernization of cities requires more high tech
buildings
with advance
designs
and there are
many
arguments regarding their construction layout.
Some
individuals hold the
view
that power should manage the criteria of pattern,
but
some
oppose that by saying that finance committee should be
given
priority to choose a picture. Nothing can
be concluded
before
a solid discussion of both
views
and this essay is going to put
some
light on these topics in the upcoming paragraphs.
Construction of scheme of
buildings
should
be controlled
by the union,
first
view
says. Definitely, officials are the leaders and nothing can
be drawn
without their decision.
So
they should be
given
the upper hand to
select
the
designs
of
buildings
as they have
highly
educated engineers and these workers have the
skills
and can
properly
evaluate
whether or not
the
designs
are
good
according to the climate, wind speed, population accommodation and the problems arising from the
designs
.
Also
, to ensure safety of mass public
because
many
financial
personalities owning the
building
ignore
such aspects to
make
more profit, state should be
given
priority for the
designs
as officials can
check
that whether the
designs
are
good
for everyone or not.
But
, latter
view
suggests that the person who provides money for construction should have the right to
make
or reject the
designs
. These persons know their
financial
horizons and
so
that is
why they can choose an appropriate construction suitable for their economic aspects. If
designs
cost more, they can
change
it
because
they cannot go beyond a certain
financial
limit.
For example
, the architecture of
Burj
Khalifa
was selected
by the makers of the
building
because
it was a mega million project.
So
financial
personalities can
also
select
designs
that suit them.
Taking everything into account, I
think
that authority should be
given
priority to
select
designs
as they
select
it by keeping in mind
many
aspects influenced by
designs
and the problems arising.