The perpetual criminal activities in some countries are extremely hard to handle nowadays. Some people advocate for more physical presence of police on the streets as a solution for this uncontrollable situation. Though it might address this problem to some extent, injecting more police personal onto the public streets is simply not a viable solution, because of its cost. I believe that there are other measures like surveillance and gun control which are more efficient approaches to eradicate crime from being infested the society.
Firstly, Surveillance is an economical option compared to mass incorporation of police on the streets. All it takes is installation of cameras in each and every corner of the street to get maximum ground coverage. This way, if some crime happens, police force can specifically target the location where the incident is being taken place, and address that issue within minutes. This is a very efficient way to handle the unlawful activities happen on the streets.
Secondly, Gun control is another strategy to putout arms from the hands of criminals, and Citizens of society for that matter. For instance, In the US, many people got killed in recent times to gun violence, where assault style guns were used by normal citizens of society who never had a criminal record on them. Had they not had guns in their hands, which can spray hundreds of bullets in seconds, the mass execution of humans could have been avoided. Countries like Australia, Netherlands and India, which have stricter gun control laws are able to eliminate military style execution from taking place.
In conclusion, we should be able to take measures that could eliminate the origins of the crime from the root level rather filling the streets with more policemen. In my perspective, beefing up the presence of police independently may not be a viable solution to eradicate the crime.
The perpetual criminal activities in
some
countries are
extremely
hard
to handle nowadays.
Some
people
advocate for more physical presence of
police
on the
streets
as a solution for this uncontrollable situation. Though it might address this problem to
some
extent, injecting more
police
personal onto the public
streets
is
simply
not a viable solution,
because
of its cost. I believe that there are other measures like surveillance and
gun
control which are more efficient approaches to eradicate
crime
from
being infested
the society.
Firstly
, Surveillance is an economical option compared to mass incorporation of
police
on the
streets
. All it takes is installation of cameras in each and every corner of the
street
to
get
maximum ground coverage. This way, if
some
crime
happens,
police
force can
specifically
target the location where the incident is
being taken
place, and address that issue within minutes. This is a
very
efficient way to handle the unlawful activities happen on the streets.
Secondly
,
Gun
control is another strategy to putout arms from the hands of criminals, and Citizens of society for that matter.
For instance
, In the US,
many
people
got
killed in recent times to
gun
violence, where assault style
guns
were
used
by normal citizens of society who never had a criminal record on them. Had they not had
guns
in their hands, which can spray hundreds of bullets in seconds, the mass execution of humans could have
been avoided
. Countries like Australia, Netherlands and India, which have stricter
gun
control laws are able to eliminate military style execution from taking place.
In conclusion
, we should be able to take measures that could eliminate the origins of the
crime
from the root level
rather
filling the
streets
with more policemen. In my perspective, beefing up the presence of
police
independently
may not be a viable solution to eradicate the
crime
.