It is often argued that whether having an enormous amount of money for particular people is good in society or the government need to create limitations to avoid this. Throughout this essay, I will discuss both statements and give my opinion, which favours the latter view.
Those who believe having significantly wealthy individuals in a country, usually defend this is a positive development because being able to free in terms of finance can give people the freedom to invest in different fields. This situation ultimately may lead to improve country’s income as a whole. For example, Italian car brand Ferrari was created by a rich Italian family for the very need of their usage, however, the name of the car had spread across the country even beyond the borders relatively soon, after this development, the family decided to invest in the car automobile sector by creating Ferrari cars and importing them to people from all over the world.
On the other hand, extreme differences on in the distribution of income can create inequalities in society. This is resulted with not every citizen having the same rights. For instance, private universities in Turkey offers two different options to the candidates to get in; The first one is having a sufficient money to pay the tuition fee where the second option is getting a remarkable grade at the university exam. If you are a student with a great enthusiasm to study at that specific university, however you could not hit the highest score on the exam and financially your family is not available to pay the school feel, you cannot get into that college.
To conclude, although having particularly wealthy people who can invest and create new sectors and a country can improve the nation’s wealth, I believe that not distributing the financial sources evenly can lead tremendous inequalities in society
It is
often
argued that whether
having
an enormous amount of money for particular
people
is
good
in society or the
government
need to create limitations to avoid this. Throughout this essay, I will discuss both statements and give my opinion, which
favours
the latter view.
Those who believe
having
significantly
wealthy individuals in a
country
,
usually
defend this is a
positive
development
because
being able to free in terms of finance can give
people
the freedom to invest in
different
fields. This situation
ultimately
may lead to
improve
country’s
income as a whole.
For example
, Italian
car
brand Ferrari
was created
by a rich Italian family for the
very
need of their usage,
however
, the name of the
car
had spread across the
country
even beyond the borders
relatively
soon
, after this development, the family decided to invest in the
car
automobile sector by creating Ferrari
cars
and importing them to
people
from all over the world.
On the other hand
, extreme differences on in the distribution of income can create inequalities in society. This
is resulted
with not every citizen
having
the same rights.
For instance
, private universities in Turkey offers two
different
options to the candidates to
get
in; The
first
one is
having
a sufficient money to pay the tuition fee where the second option is getting a remarkable grade at the university exam. If you are a student with a great enthusiasm to study at that specific university,
however
you could not hit the highest score on the exam and
financially
your family is not available to pay the school feel, you cannot
get
into that college.
To conclude
, although
having
particularly
wealthy
people
who can invest and create new sectors and a
country
can
improve
the nation’s wealth, I believe that not distributing the financial sources
evenly
can lead tremendous inequalities in society
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
17Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
2Mistakes