There is no denying the fact that technological development has had a negative impact on the planet. Everything from the air we breathe to the food we eat is contaminated these days due to the use and abuse of various inventions of technology. For example, motor vehicles pollute the air. Pesticides contaminate the food we eat. Some people believe that the only way to reverse environmental damage caused by technology is to adopt a simple lifestyle. Others insist that technology can undo the damage caused by it. I agree with this view.
To start with, the argument that we all should now live a simpler life devoid of technology is impractical. We are so habituated to having technology in our life that it is now impossible to imagine a world without light bulbs, fans, refrigerators or computers. So, even if technology is causing considerable environmental damage it is impossible to convince people that they should stop using it.
A better solution is to invest in greener technologies that can mitigate much of the environmental damage already done. Scientists have already started working on them. For example, many trains now run on electricity. They cause much less pollution than diesel engines. Electric cars are another promising technology. It is safe to assume that in 10 or 15 years, they will completely replace cars running on fossil fuels. Likewise, greener energy sources like wind and solar may soon replace conventional energy sources like coal.
To conclude, while it is true that technology caused a great deal of damage to the environment, it is also quite capable of finding solutions to the problems it caused. As technology continues to develop, I am sure it will become cleaner and greener. Thus the argument that adopting a simple life is the only way to mitigate environmental damage does not hold much water.
There is no denying the fact that technological development has had a
negative
impact on the planet. Everything from the air we breathe to the food we eat
is contaminated
these days due to the
use
and abuse of various inventions of
technology
.
For example
, motor vehicles pollute the air. Pesticides contaminate the food we eat.
Some
people
believe that the
only
way to reverse
environmental
damage
caused
by
technology
is to adopt a simple lifestyle. Others insist that
technology
can undo the
damage
caused
by it. I
agree
with this view.
To
start
with, the argument that we all should
now
live
a simpler life devoid of
technology
is impractical. We are
so
habituated to having
technology
in our life that it is
now
impossible to imagine a world without light bulbs, fans, refrigerators or computers.
So
, even if
technology
is causing considerable
environmental
damage
it is impossible to convince
people
that they should
stop
using it.
A better solution is to invest in greener
technologies
that can mitigate much of the
environmental
damage
already done. Scientists have already
started
working on them.
For example
,
many
trains
now
run on electricity. They cause much less pollution than diesel engines. Electric cars are another promising
technology
. It is safe to assume that in 10 or 15 years, they will completely replace cars running on fossil fuels.
Likewise
, greener energy sources like wind and solar may
soon
replace conventional energy sources like coal.
To conclude
, while it is true that
technology
caused
a great deal of
damage
to the environment, it is
also
quite capable of finding solutions to the problems it
caused
. As
technology
continues to develop, I am sure it will become cleaner and greener.
Thus
the argument that adopting a simple life is the
only
way to mitigate
environmental
damage
does not hold much water.