Smoking and its ample consequences are widely discussed these days all over the world. Research and studies point out that the active and passive smoking are equally threatening to the individual and society. Though there is a small issue regarding the restriction: personal freedom, I hold the view that the ban and restriction on smoking, especially in public places and office settings, are totally acceptable.
One of the obvious reasons, public smoking causes various health hazards. To be more precise, major causes of the lung, oral cancers and heart ailments is none other than tobacco smoking. Prevention is better than cure. Instead of spending a large amount of money to treat these kinds of diseases, government’s decision on banning and controlling on smoking is more economic and effective. Furthermore, passive smoking, which usually happens in public places, claims thousands of innocent people's life across the world. At this juncture, prevention of little freedom like allowing public cigarette flaming is not justifiable. To cite an example, in the USA, the public smoking ban reduces the passive smokers’ cancer rates.
Another reason to support my view is that the public smoking restrictions decline the fire risk rate to a great extent. In other words, in this congested world, allowing of public smoking is like adding fuel to the fire. Careless handling of cigarette fire causes major fire problem. It claims not only thousands of innocent lives but also public possessions. These social problems can be wisely handled by control of public smoking restrictions. In the UK, public smoking ban immensely reduced the building fire incidents in cities is the best epitome. However, an army of people claims that this is the breach of personal freedom. Perhaps it may be true to some degree, but we cannot deny that the public safety is much more important than mild freedom block.
To crown it all, ban and control of public smoking are beneficial, especially for the individual as well as the society. Banning public smoking will enhance the public health and safety in many ways. To consider banning smoking a huge positive impact its ignorable drawbacks are completely negligible.
Smoking
and its ample consequences are
widely
discussed these days all over the world. Research and studies point out that the active and passive
smoking
are
equally
threatening to the individual and society. Though there is a
small
issue regarding the
restriction
: personal
freedom
, I hold the view that the
ban
and
restriction
on
smoking
,
especially
in
public
places and office settings, are
totally
acceptable.
One of the obvious reasons,
public
smoking
causes various health hazards. To be more precise, major causes of the lung, oral cancers and heart ailments is none other than tobacco
smoking
. Prevention is better than cure.
Instead
of spending a large amount of money to treat these kinds of diseases,
government
’s decision on banning and controlling on
smoking
is more economic and effective.
Furthermore
, passive
smoking
, which
usually
happens in
public
places, claims thousands of innocent
people
's life across the world. At this juncture, prevention of
little
freedom
like allowing
public
cigarette flaming is not justifiable. To cite an example, in the USA, the
public
smoking
ban
reduces
the passive smokers’ cancer rates.
Another reason to support my view is that the
public
smoking
restrictions
decline the
fire
risk
rate to a great extent.
In other words
, in this congested world, allowing of
public
smoking
is like adding fuel to the
fire
. Careless handling of cigarette
fire
causes major
fire
problem. It claims not
only
thousands of innocent
lives
but
also
public
possessions. These social problems can be
wisely
handled by control of
public
smoking
restrictions
. In the UK,
public
smoking
ban
immensely
reduced
the building
fire
incidents in cities is the best epitome.
However
, an army of
people
claims that this is the breach of personal
freedom
. Perhaps it may be true to
some
degree,
but
we cannot deny that the
public
safety is much more
important
than mild
freedom
block.
To crown it all,
ban
and control of
public
smoking
are beneficial,
especially
for the individual
as well
as the society. Banning
public
smoking
will enhance the
public
health and safety in
many
ways. To consider banning
smoking
a huge
positive
impact its ignorable drawbacks are completely negligible.