Nowadays, in this competitive world, tourist attraction is one of the most prominent and beneficial ways to increase countries` income undoubtedly. Hence, governments try to devise some appropriate plans to facilitating tourists traveling to their countries. In this attitude, more countries opened their doors for foreign tourists after decreasing the price of traveling to other countries. I will discussed about advantages and disadvantages of this tendency and in follow, I will describe my opinion.
One of the most important indicators for people to travel as a tourist is convenience of traveling to other countries. Many countries try to diminish their strictly rules for foreign tourists because of several beneficial results of that. Lots of commercial experts are unanimous in profits of tourist traveling for host countries. They argue that without any hesitation tourism is one of the easiest ways to increase income for countries. As evidence, recent published reports in Turkey illustrated that three tenth of their income comes from the tourism industry. Consequently, they try to distribute this industry by expanding facilities and constructing fundamental requirements. Furthermore, according to United Nations report, tourism is the best way to distribute cultural and commercial communications between countries.
On the other hand, some social researchers claim that this approach have several significant issues for host countries. In their opinion, first of all, host countries are very busy and crowded most of the times and it make people unsatisfied and uneasy. Secondly, by increasing the number of tourists from undeveloped countries to modern world because of low price of traveling, some people from developed host countries insist that majority of tourists have demand to stay in their country as an immigrant and it can be perilous for their culture and economy undoubtedly.
In conclusion, by comparing both sides of this argument it is obvious that because of financial profits of this tendency governments are resolute to pursue this method. I believe that tourism distribution in countries as one of the best way for increasing income and communication is unavoidable but countries should increase their safety to avoiding from any unforeseen risks in their countries.
Nowadays, in this competitive world,
tourist
attraction is one of the most prominent and beneficial
ways
to increase
countries`
income
undoubtedly
.
Hence
,
governments
try to devise
some
appropriate plans to facilitating
tourists
traveling to their
countries
. In this attitude, more
countries
opened their doors for foreign
tourists
after decreasing the price of traveling to other
countries
. I will
discussed about advantages
and disadvantages of this tendency and in follow, I will
describe
my opinion.
One of the most
important
indicators for
people
to travel as a
tourist
is convenience of traveling to other
countries
.
Many
countries
try to diminish their
strictly
rules
for foreign
tourists
because
of several beneficial results of that. Lots of commercial experts are unanimous in profits of
tourist
traveling for
host
countries
. They argue that without any hesitation
tourism
is one of the easiest
ways
to increase
income
for
countries
. As evidence, recent published reports in Turkey illustrated that three tenth of their
income
comes
from the
tourism
industry.
Consequently
, they try to distribute this industry by expanding facilities and constructing fundamental requirements.
Furthermore
, according to United Nations report,
tourism
is the best
way
to distribute cultural and commercial communications between countries.
On the other hand
,
some
social researchers claim that this approach have several significant issues for
host
countries
. In their opinion,
first of all
,
host
countries
are
very
busy and crowded
most of the times
and it
make
people
unsatisfied and uneasy.
Secondly
, by increasing the number of
tourists
from undeveloped
countries
to modern world
because
of low price of traveling,
some
people
from developed
host
countries
insist that majority of
tourists
have demand to stay in their
country
as an immigrant and it can be perilous for their culture and economy
undoubtedly
.
In conclusion
, by comparing both sides of this argument it is obvious that
because
of financial profits of this tendency
governments
are resolute to pursue this method. I believe that
tourism
distribution in
countries
as one of the best
way
for increasing
income
and communication is unavoidable
but
countries
should increase their safety to avoiding from any unforeseen
risks
in their
countries
.