Today’s world is divided into industrialised countries and poor nations, where the main difference between them is the amount of money that they spend in the healthcare system, commerce and infrastructures. Most of those developing nations are living under the poverty line, and in my opinion, wealthy nations have the ability and the responsibility to help them.
Rich countries are more capable of helping those less fortunate countries than their own governments because of many reasons. Firstly, most poor nations are buried into debts as a result of their unbalanced finance and inexperienced or corrupted administrations. This reflected in a weak and failed healthcare and education system and a weak international trade policy. This vicious cycle will continue unless rich countries take the responsibility of helping those nations and minimising the huge worldwide economic difference. For example, the World Bank can nullify their debts or rich nations can help them with some projects to help to pay for these debts. Secondly, many of those countries are living in subhuman conditions because of extreme poverty and epidemic diseases such as AIDS and cholera and they either do not have the knowledge or the sufficient medical resources to improve this situation. However, developed countries can donate free drugs, and send doctors and nurses to treat and educate infected population so as to prevent these diseases from spreading.
On the other hand, many people from poor countries immigrate to rich countries to work or study. This result in many consequences: the first consequence is that they help to improve the economy of developed countries. For example in countries like the UK or FRANCE, there are lots of emigrants who prove themselves by their knowledge and hard working. Then it seems to be sensible that these wealthy nations should, in turn, help their home countries. In addition, the economy of poor countries gets worse because they have lost their most skilful and educated people while they need them to work and lead these nation to a better future. Finally, it would be difficult for poor nations to help themselves and grow without basic needs such as food, shelter, treatment and education.
In conclusion, I believe that it would be less likely to see any improvement in developing nation economy and status without the cooperation of wealthy countries.
Today
’s world
is divided
into
industrialised
countries
and
poor
nations
, where the main difference between them is the amount of money that they spend in the healthcare system, commerce and infrastructures. Most of those developing
nations
are living under the poverty line, and in my opinion, wealthy
nations
have the ability and the responsibility to
help
them.
Rich
countries
are more capable of helping those less fortunate
countries
than their
own
governments
because
of
many
reasons.
Firstly
, most
poor
nations
are buried
into debts
as a result
of their unbalanced finance and inexperienced or corrupted administrations. This reflected in a weak and failed healthcare and education system and a weak international trade policy. This vicious cycle will continue unless rich
countries
take the responsibility of helping those
nations
and
minimising
the huge worldwide economic difference.
For example
, the World Bank can nullify their debts or rich
nations
can
help
them with
some
projects to
help
to pay for these debts.
Secondly
,
many
of those
countries
are living in subhuman conditions
because
of extreme poverty and epidemic diseases such as AIDS and
cholera and
they either do not have the knowledge or the sufficient medical resources to
improve
this situation.
However
, developed
countries
can donate free drugs, and
send
doctors and nurses to treat and educate infected population
so as to
prevent
these diseases from spreading.
On the other hand
,
many
people
from
poor
countries
immigrate to rich
countries
to work or study. This result in
many
consequences: the
first
consequence is that they
help
to
improve
the economy of developed
countries
.
For example
in
countries
like the UK or FRANCE, there are lots of emigrants who prove themselves by their knowledge and
hard working
. Then it seems to be sensible that these wealthy
nations
should, in turn,
help
their home
countries
.
In addition
, the economy of
poor
countries
gets
worse
because
they have lost their most
skilful
and educated
people
while they need them to work and lead these
nation
to a better future.
Finally
, it would be difficult for
poor
nations
to
help
themselves and grow without basic needs such as food, shelter, treatment and education.
In conclusion
, I believe that it would be less likely to
see
any improvement in developing
nation
economy and status without the cooperation of wealthy
countries
.