There is a considerable debate over charity and aid system in first world countries. This essay is about the necessity of providing life supplies and education to nations which can’t stand on their feet and why these nations should be responsible for providing aid to poor countries.
First of all, it all started with the invention of steam power. Human kind's exploration chances have risen enormously with this invention and as a result of this colonisation became a real deal. While masters increased their wealth, slaves' life standard decreased tremendously. Because of this decrease in life standards, many of the former colonies don't have the power to provide their own nation with even basic requirements. From another point of view, living and education is a birth right of humanity and these shouldn't be a concern normally. Wealthy nations should also take responsibility to provide suitable life needs it most. For instance, anyone who seeks for justice should have right to escalate their case to European Court of Human Rights and similar processes should be available for people who are seeking for their born rights such as foods and education.
On the other hand, the main reason why people favour the idea not to share their wealth with others is that it would mean the end of colonisation worldwide. They believe that they had plenty of time to improve their economy. As a result of this, it was the poor nations' problem to take care of their mess.
In conclusion, my personal view about charity and aid to poor nations is a responsibility of both parts. Wealthy nations should provide local governments with aid and guidance to offer their nation with better life standards.
There is a considerable debate over charity and
aid
system in
first
world countries. This essay is about the necessity of providing
life
supplies and education to
nations
which can’t stand on their feet and why these
nations
should be responsible for providing
aid
to poor countries.
First of all
, it all
started
with the invention of steam power. Human kind's exploration chances have risen
enormously
with this invention and
as a result
of this
colonisation
became a real deal. While masters increased their wealth, slaves'
life
standard decreased
tremendously
.
Because of this
decrease in
life
standards,
many
of the former colonies don't have the power to provide their
own
nation
with even basic requirements. From another point of view, living and education is a birth
right
of humanity and these shouldn't be a concern
normally
. Wealthy
nations
should
also
take responsibility to provide suitable
life
needs it most.
For instance
, anyone who seeks for justice should have
right
to escalate their case to European Court of Human
Rights
and similar processes should be available for
people
who are seeking for their born
rights
such as foods and education.
On the other hand
, the main reason why
people
favour
the
idea
not to share their wealth with others is that it would mean the
end
of
colonisation
worldwide. They believe that they had
plenty
of time to
improve
their economy.
As a result
of this, it was the poor nations' problem to take care of their mess.
In conclusion
, my personal view about charity and
aid
to poor
nations
is a responsibility of both parts. Wealthy
nations
should provide local
governments
with
aid
and guidance to offer their
nation
with better
life
standards.