Some believe the past does not illuminate the present, whereas others say it is vital to know history to be able to understand the current times. Throughout this essay I will discuss both sides and give my opinion, which favours of the latter view.
Supporters of the former opinion argue that events that happened in the past are irrelevant for today’s developments and events. This is because the essential topics of the globe are constantly changing due to past industrial development and continued technological breakthroughs. Therefore, looking for answers by observing the past would not provide us with answers for today. As an example, the daily struggles of a stone age man and those of a man from the new millennium are not similar: while one is trying to discover new ways to hunt a deer, the other is facing modern city life problems such as air pollution.
However, examining the past provides human beings with an advanced knowledge on varied issues where human emotions and their basic necessities are involved. Since the beginning of time, individuals have shared common concerns and thoughts, such as having a shelter and maintaining good conditions for their life, even though the definition of these things may change depending on the era. For example, having shelter in one era meant having a cage, but now this definition stands for a flat or a house. Despite that, the core issues have remained the same. Therefore, understanding the past will provide light for the new roads ahead for humanity.
To conclude, although history at many levels is not relevant with what is happening now in the world, since a great number of things have already been changed, I believe that it is vital to learn the past, as human beings are still sharing many common grounds with their ancestors such as feelings and the fundamental needs of life.
Some
believe the
past
does not illuminate the present, whereas others say it is vital to know history to be able to understand the
current
times. Throughout this essay I will discuss both sides and give my opinion, which
favours
of the latter view.
Supporters of the former opinion argue that
events
that happened in the
past
are irrelevant for
today
’s developments and
events
. This is
because
the essential topics of the globe are
constantly
changing due to
past
industrial development and continued technological breakthroughs.
Therefore
, looking for answers by observing the
past
would not provide us with answers for
today
. As an example, the daily struggles of a
stone age
man
and those of a
man
from the new millennium are not similar: while one is trying to discover new ways to hunt a deer, the other is facing modern city life problems such as air pollution.
However
, examining the
past
provides human beings with an advanced knowledge on varied issues where human emotions and their
basic necessities
are involved
. Since the beginning of time, individuals have shared common concerns and thoughts, such as having a shelter and maintaining
good
conditions for their life,
even though
the definition of these things may
change
depending on the era.
For example
, having shelter in one era meant having a cage,
but
now
this definition stands for a flat or a
house
. Despite that, the core issues have remained the same.
Therefore
, understanding the
past
will provide light for the new roads ahead for humanity.
To conclude
, although history at
many
levels is not relevant with what is happening
now
in the world, since a great number of things have already been
changed
, I believe that it is vital to learn the
past
, as human beings are
still
sharing
many
common grounds with their ancestors such as feelings and the fundamental needs of life.