There are many languages in the world. However, minority languages are going to disappear due to the decreased use among the people. While there are some opinions suggesting that spending on language preservation is wasteful, I believe that preventing language destruction should be seriously invested in by the government.
On the one hand, tribal communities’ languages are not commonly used and that is not helpful when it comes to economic benefits. Some popularly spoken languages such as Chinese, Spanish, English and Arabic are utilized worldwide while rarely spoken languages are not widely used. Therefore, people think that the government should prioritize their budget on other important sectors such as education, infrastructure, technology and national defence. For example, in Europe, it is encouraged that one country only speaks one language which not only helps significantly reduce misunderstandings in communication, but also drive the cross-border trading become smoother by using a unified language.
On the other hand, destruction in languages will lead to the loss of cultural diverses. Because each language presents a unique culture and speciality of that community, the distinction will unintentionally destroy its beauty. For example, the data show that three languages astonish every day and that future generations will no longer enjoy the diversification in the world cultural heritage because of the boring unification of languages.
In short, language is one of the valuable assets of world cultures. Although language preservation’s cost concern of lots of people with its less noticeable economic benefits, the values in cultural diverses are far more important to think about.
There are
many
languages
in the world.
However
, minority
languages
are going to disappear due to the decreased
use
among the
people
. While there are
some
opinions suggesting that spending on
language
preservation is wasteful, I believe that preventing
language
destruction should be
seriously
invested in by the
government
.
On the one hand, tribal communities’
languages
are not
commonly
used
and
that is
not helpful when it
comes
to economic benefits.
Some
popularly
spoken
languages
such as Chinese, Spanish, English and Arabic
are utilized
worldwide while rarely spoken
languages
are not
widely
used
.
Therefore
,
people
think
that the
government
should prioritize their budget on other
important
sectors such as education, infrastructure, technology and national
defence
.
For example
, in Europe, it
is encouraged
that one country
only
speaks one
language
which not
only
helps
significantly
reduce
misunderstandings in communication,
but
also
drive the cross-border trading become smoother by using a unified language.
On the other hand
, destruction in
languages
will lead to the loss of cultural
diverses
.
Because
each
language
presents a unique culture and
speciality
of that community, the distinction will
unintentionally
destroy
its beauty.
For example
, the data
show
that three
languages
astonish every day and that future generations will no longer enjoy the diversification in the world cultural heritage
because
of the boring unification of languages.
In short,
language
is one of the valuable assets of world cultures. Although
language
preservation’s cost concern of lots of
people
with its less noticeable economic benefits, the values in cultural
diverses
are far more
important
to
think
about.
9Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
13Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
4Mistakes