When the issue of global language comes into view, there exist conflicting opinions. Some people claim that minority languages may be on the verge of extinction in the near future, while others adopt an opposing view that governments could allocate funds to halt the disappearance of minority languages. In my opinion, I believe that these languages should put on high regard.
There are several reasons why saving minority languages serve to no purpose. First and foremost, the state budget ought to focus on the welfare of citizens beforehand. If a nation can neither eradicate poverty nor reduce the rate of illiteracy, spending a large sum of money on preserving languages spoken by a small number of ppl should not be taken into consideration. This directly suggests that money might be better spent on other public services. Another reason is that speaking one language only would be much cheaper and more efficient for countries, since governments could cut all kinds of costs related to communicating with each minority group.
Despite the above arguments, I believe that governments should try to preserve languages that are less widely spoken. A language is much more than simply a means of communication; it has a vital connection with the cultural identity of the people who speak it. If a language disappears, a whole way of life will disappear with it, and we will lose the rich cultural diversity that makes societies more interesting. By spending money to protect minority languages, governments can also preserve traditions, customs and behaviours that are part of a country’s history.
In conclusion, it may save money in the short term if we allow minority languages to disappear, but in the long term this would have an extremely negative impact on our cultural heritage.
When the issue of global
language
comes
into view, there exist conflicting opinions.
Some
people
claim that
minority
languages
may be on the verge of extinction in the near future, while others adopt an opposing view that
governments
could allocate funds to halt the disappearance of
minority
languages
. In my opinion, I believe that these
languages
should put on high regard.
There are several reasons why saving
minority
languages
serve to no purpose.
First
and foremost, the state budget ought to focus on the welfare of citizens beforehand. If a nation can neither eradicate poverty nor
reduce
the rate of illiteracy, spending a large sum of
money
on preserving
languages
spoken by a
small
number of
ppl
should not
be taken
into consideration. This
directly
suggests that
money
might be better spent on other public services. Another reason is that speaking one
language
only
would be much cheaper and more efficient for countries, since
governments
could
cut
all kinds of costs related to communicating with each
minority
group.
Despite the above arguments, I believe that
governments
should try to preserve
languages
that are less
widely
spoken. A
language
is much more than
simply
a means of communication; it has a vital connection with the cultural identity of the
people
who speak it. If a
language
disappears, a whole way of life will disappear with it, and we will lose the rich cultural diversity that
makes
societies more interesting. By spending
money
to protect
minority
languages
,
governments
can
also
preserve traditions, customs and
behaviours
that are part of a country’s history.
In conclusion
, it may save
money
in the short term if we
allow
minority
languages
to disappear,
but
in the long term this would have an
extremely
negative
impact on our cultural heritage.