An increasing concern for many governments around the world is the declining health of their citizens due to a poor diet. While some people believe governments should be responsible for improving the health of their nation, others believe it is up to the individual. This essay will examine both sides of the argument.
There is no doubt that individuals must take some responsibility for their diet and health. The argument to support this is the fact that adults have free will and make their own choices about what they eat and the exercise that they do. Children are also becoming less healthy. However, their parents are the ones who provide their evening meals so it is their responsibility to ensure these meals are nutritious and encourage them to avoid junk food and sugary snacks during the day.
Despite these arguments, there is also a case for advocating the intervention of the state. People these days often have little choice but to depend on fast food or ready meals that are high in sugar, salt and fat due to the pressures of work. Governments could regulate the ingredients of such food. Some governments also spend huge amounts of tax money on treating health problems of their citizens in hospitals. It would be logical to spend this on preventative measures such as campaigns to encourage exercise and a good diet.
Having considered both sides of the issue, I would argue that although individuals must take ultimate responsibility for what they eat, governments also have a role to play as only they can regulate the food supply, which openly encourages a poor diet. It is only through this combination that we can improve people’s health.
An increasing concern for
many
governments
around the world is the declining
health
of their citizens due to a poor diet. While
some
people
believe
governments
should be responsible for improving the
health
of their nation, others believe it is up to the individual. This essay will examine both sides of the argument.
There is no doubt that individuals
must
take
some
responsibility for their diet and
health
. The argument to support this is the fact that adults have free will and
make
their
own
choices about what they eat and the exercise that they do. Children are
also
becoming less healthy.
However
, their parents are the ones who provide their evening meals
so
it is their responsibility to ensure these meals are nutritious and encourage them to avoid junk
food
and sugary snacks during the day.
Despite these arguments, there is
also
a case for advocating the intervention of the state.
People
these days
often
have
little
choice
but
to depend on
fast
food
or ready meals that are high in sugar, salt and
fat
due to the pressures of work.
Governments
could regulate the ingredients of such
food
.
Some
governments
also
spend huge amounts of tax money on treating
health
problems of their citizens in hospitals. It would be logical to spend this on preventative measures such as campaigns to encourage exercise and a
good
diet.
Having considered both sides of the issue, I would argue that although individuals
must
take ultimate responsibility for what they eat,
governments
also
have a role to play as
only
they can regulate the
food
supply, which
openly
encourages a poor diet. It is
only
through this combination that we can
improve
people
’s
health
.