Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree? v.9
Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. v. 9
There’s no doubt that in the modern World poorer countries dealing with a lot of problem than rich nations. While some people believes that, modern countries should prevent a lot of thinks also only financal support will be not enough for them, others argues that, the money can solve any problem and rich countries could focus their areas. In this essay, I will discuss both sides of the arguements and explain my support for the former view.
Nowadays, countries who have not enough money suffering more problems than others. For example, in these countries they can not access medical systems well and even when they are not suffering any bad disease, it can be still dangerous for them, such as flu because of their health systems. To solve this problems richer countries can help them. For instance, if rich nations prevent health than the countries who have not enough money will not suffer this problem anymore.
In other words, some people believe money can solve any problem. However, the experience of using money is so important like this situations. For instance, even if they reach the money, when they do not have any profession for any problem they will only lose money for nothing. Furthermore, the money does not provide experience, however experience does. If modern countries prevent a pathway for poorer nations, these countries could use this money effectively.
In conclusion, although money can solve some problems, however, in my opinion, money will not enough for poorer countries. The countries who have enough money, should prevent to poor nations professionals and pathways with money.
There’s no doubt that in the modern World poorer
countries
dealing with
a lot of
problem
than rich
nations
. While
some
people
believes
that, modern
countries
should
prevent
a lot of
thinks
also
only
financal
support will be not
enough
for them, others argues that, the
money
can
solve
any
problem
and rich
countries
could focus their areas. In this essay, I will discuss both sides of the
arguements
and
explain
my support for the former view.
Nowadays,
countries
who have not
enough
money
suffering more
problems
than others.
For example
, in these
countries
they can not access medical systems well and even when they are not suffering any
bad
disease, it can be
still
dangerous
for them, such as flu
because
of their health systems. To
solve
this
problems
richer
countries
can
help
them.
For instance
, if rich
nations
prevent
health than the
countries
who have not
enough
money
will not suffer this
problem
anymore.
In other words
,
some
people
believe
money
can
solve
any
problem
.
However
, the experience of using
money
is
so
important
like
this
situations.
For instance
, even if they reach the
money
, when they do not have any profession for any
problem
they will
only
lose
money
for nothing.
Furthermore
, the
money
does not provide experience,
however
experience does. If modern
countries
prevent
a pathway for poorer
nations
, these
countries
could
use
this
money
effectively
.
In conclusion
, although
money
can
solve
some
problems
,
however
, in my opinion,
money
will not
enough
for poorer
countries
. The
countries
who have
enough
money
, should
prevent
to poor
nations
professionals and pathways with
money
.
14Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
49Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
6Mistakes