Ownership of mobile phones has risen dramatically in recent years, despite the ponytail harmful effects they may have on our health and society. Governments should introduce measures to restrict ownership of mobile phones to those who need them for their work.
Recent technological development allowed everyone to have a mobile phone and be instantly connected to the whole world. This is a beneficial achievement which improves various aspects of routine and work-life, however, some disagree with this statement and argue that mobile phone usage is rather harmful than positive and should be restricted by governments. I personally belong to the first group of thinkers considering the opportunity to use mobile as an empowering feature.
Firstly, having a mobile phone is often a life-saviour solution in a dangerous situation for instance, in a remote area if somebody got lost or experienced an accident. Another reason against mobile phone restriction is that individuals using the internet are able to communicate with others from all corners of the world. This, actually brings all people closer, letting them discover other cultures which can potentially diminish misunderstanding and nationalism.
On the other hand, there is no solid evidence to approve a theory about the detrimental effects on extremely mobile users, neither an evidence that using the internet destroys society, as it was said rather it is the opposite. Furthermore, drastic measurements as governments' interruption in a personal life in order to regulate daily longitude of mobile usage are not appropriate to the issue since every individual has the right to define independently this sort of matter.
To summarise, phone ownership promotes personal efficiency, communication and broadens mind while negative claims of mobile usage are yet to be proven. In this case if governments decide to regulate this aspect of human life that would negatively impact citizens freedom and society on the whole.
Ownership of mobile
phones
has risen
dramatically
in recent years, despite the ponytail harmful effects they may have on our health and society.
Governments
should introduce measures to restrict ownership of mobile
phones
to those who need them for their work.
Recent technological development
allowed
everyone to have a mobile
phone
and be
instantly
connected to the whole world. This is a beneficial achievement which
improves
various aspects of routine and work-life,
however
,
some
disagree with this statement and argue that mobile
phone
usage is
rather
harmful than
positive
and should
be restricted
by
governments
. I
personally
belong to the
first
group of thinkers considering the opportunity to
use
mobile as an empowering feature.
Firstly
, having a mobile
phone
is
often
a
life-saviour
solution in a
dangerous
situation
for instance
, in a remote area if somebody
got
lost or experienced an accident. Another reason against mobile
phone
restriction is that individuals using the internet are able to communicate with others from all corners of the world. This, actually brings all
people
closer, letting them discover other cultures which can
potentially
diminish misunderstanding and nationalism.
On the other hand
, there is no solid evidence to approve a theory about the detrimental effects on
extremely
mobile users, neither an evidence that using the internet
destroys
society, as it
was said
rather
it is the opposite.
Furthermore
, drastic measurements as
governments
' interruption in a personal life in order to regulate daily longitude of mobile usage are not appropriate to the issue since every individual has the right to define
independently
this sort of matter.
To
summarise
,
phone
ownership promotes personal efficiency, communication and broadens mind while
negative
claims of mobile usage are
yet
to
be proven
.
In this case
if
governments
decide to regulate this aspect of human life that would
negatively
impact citizens freedom and society
on the whole
.