Animal experimentation has been a debated issue for many decades. It is true that medicines and other daily products are tested on animals before they are cleared for human use. However, it is often suggested that medical experiments should not conduct on animals. I agree with statement yet some conservative swing in the opposite direction. I will elaborate my opinion in the upcoming paragraphs.
To embark upon, the most convincing argument in the favour of this claim is animals also have rights. Needless to say, just like humans, animals also have their rights. Animal testing does not mean it is 100% safe for human then why animals are often killed for testing as well as they are frequently suffering from extreme pain. Moreover, the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused and the scientist should use alternative methods for research.
On the other hand, there is no other alternative to check the effectiveness of drugs and human life is more precious than animals that are why no country allows to direct test on the humanity. In addition, it is reasonable to put life of some animals at risk to save lives of the masses.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion, on balance, that the benefits do not outweigh the disadvantages, and testing on animals should not continue. Although it may improve the lives of humans, it is not fair that animals should suffer in order to achieve this.
Animal
experimentation has been a debated issue for
many
decades. It is true that medicines and other daily products are
tested
on
animals
before
they
are cleared
for
human
use
.
However
, it is
often
suggested that medical experiments should not conduct on
animals
. I
agree
with statement
yet
some
conservative swing in the opposite direction. I will elaborate my opinion in the upcoming paragraphs.
To embark upon, the most convincing argument in the
favour
of this claim is
animals
also
have rights. Needless to say,
just
like
humans
,
animals
also
have their rights.
Animal
testing does not mean it is 100% safe for
human
then why
animals
are
often
killed for testing
as well
as they are
frequently
suffering from extreme pain.
Moreover
, the benefits to
humans
do not justify the suffering caused and the scientist should
use
alternative methods for research.
On the other hand
, there is no other alternative to
check
the effectiveness of drugs and
human
life is more precious than
animals
that are why no country
allows
to direct
test
on the humanity.
In addition
, it is reasonable to put life of
some
animals
at
risk
to save
lives
of the masses.
In conclusion
, I am of the opinion, on balance, that the benefits do not outweigh the disadvantages, and testing on
animals
should not continue. Although it may
improve
the
lives
of
humans
, it is not
fair
that
animals
should suffer in order to achieve this.
9Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
17Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes