IIt is true that some experts of medical and teaching fields have a lower income than celebrities. The difference is still argumentative. However, I think the society should pay musicians and teachers better for their contribution.
On the one hand, I believe that medical and teaching jobs should be paid a better income than entertaining jobs for some justifications. The first reason is that medicine and education are key factors contributing to the development of society, therefore, a shortage of employees in the two sectors will cause the imbalance of a country. As a result, the government should impose beneficial policies of income for people working in these fields in order to keep the labour source sufficiently. Besides, a lucrative salary will stimulate musicians and teachers to enhance their skills as well as create breakthroughs, benefiting the society in various aspects. For example, the Nobel prize, with a valuable reward can afford the expenditure of scientists when they do researchers and encourage them to put more effort into their professionals.
However, I think it is likely reasonable to pay an escalating income for celebrities. firstly, famous people draw a great attraction of the public, which facilitates for companies. As a result, businesses are willing to pay celebrities well with a purpose of hiring them to promote products. Another reason for this issue is that recreational activities also contribute to developing a country like other fields when it brings a huge amount of profit through tourism. In fact, some authorities use celebrities to represent the national identity, spreading the fame of the country out over the world. Therefore, the government need to give them plenty of money to acknowledge their contribution to the public.
In conclusion, I partly agree that medical and teaching jobs need paying higher than any works in the society because of the tremendous roles. However, it seems not reasonable when celebrities are paid well and the government need to consider the advantages of each field in order to have an appropriate support.
IIt
is true that
some
experts of medical and teaching
fields
have a lower
income
than
celebrities
. The difference is
still
argumentative.
However
, I
think
the
society
should pay musicians and teachers better for their contribution.
On the one hand, I believe that medical and teaching jobs should
be paid
a better
income
than entertaining jobs for
some
justifications. The
first
reason is that medicine and education are key factors contributing to the development of
society
,
therefore
, a shortage of employees in the two sectors will cause the imbalance of a country.
As a result
, the
government
should impose beneficial policies of
income
for
people
working in these
fields
in order to
keep
the
labour
source
sufficiently
.
Besides
, a lucrative salary will stimulate musicians and teachers to enhance their
skills
as well
as create breakthroughs, benefiting the
society
in various aspects.
For example
, the
Nobel prize
, with a valuable reward can afford the expenditure of scientists when they do researchers and encourage them to put more effort into their professionals.
However
, I
think
it is likely reasonable to pay an escalating
income
for
celebrities
.
firstly
,
famous
people
draw a great attraction of the public, which facilitates for
companies
.
As a result
, businesses are willing to pay
celebrities
well with a purpose of hiring them to promote products. Another reason for this issue is that recreational activities
also
contribute to developing a country like other
fields
when it brings a huge amount of profit through tourism. In fact,
some
authorities
use
celebrities
to represent the national identity, spreading the fame of the country out over the world.
Therefore
, the
government
need to give them
plenty
of money to acknowledge their contribution to the public.
In conclusion
, I partly
agree
that medical and teaching jobs need paying higher than any works in the
society
because
of the tremendous roles.
However
, it seems not reasonable when
celebrities
are paid
well and the
government
need to consider the advantages of each
field
in order to have an appropriate support.