Despite prison sentences is the popular method in most nations to combat the criminal issues, a considerable number of people think that the improvement on education is more effectively to solve this problem. In my opinion, I completely disagree with this view, because I believe that both ways have their own characteristic benefits and should play a vital role in reducing crime.
On the one hand, I would assert that prison is effective in dealing with criminals. The first reason is that an individual who commits the offense must learn that illegal actions have consequences. For example, murderers and rapists must be sentenced to a plethora of years in jail because of their behaviours. This means that they need to know that they will face loss of liberty, social isolation and disconnection from their families and friends if they carry out such a wrongdoing. Another reason is that when heinous offenders are behind bars, they no longer a peril to community and residents can walk in the streets or unwind in their private houses more safety.
On the other hand, I consider that education also plays a complementary role to reduce the crime level. Firstly, youngsters should be taught about features of the law which influence on their lives. Having a wide range of knowledge about legislation, those youngsters are finer prepared to keep away from situations which may involve them in offense or becoming a victim. For example, students must learn the essential laws about driving or road safety. Secondly, behind prison-bars, education programmes must aim to provide prisoners with skills and qualifications to find work and reintegrate back into society when they are released.
In conclusion, I believe that prison sentences are one crucial weapon in the fight against crime, and I disagree that providing better education sole is more effective solution to decrease the crime rate.
Despite prison sentences is the popular method in most nations to combat the criminal issues, a considerable number of
people
think
that the improvement on
education
is more
effectively
to solve this problem. In my opinion, I completely disagree with this view,
because
I believe that both ways have their
own
characteristic benefits and should play a vital role in reducing crime.
On the one hand, I would assert that prison is effective in dealing with criminals. The
first
reason is that an individual who commits the offense
must
learn that illegal actions have consequences.
For example
, murderers and rapists
must
be sentenced
to a plethora of years in jail
because
of their
behaviours
. This means that they need to know that they will face loss of liberty, social isolation and disconnection from their families and friends if they carry out such a wrongdoing. Another reason is that when heinous offenders are behind bars, they no longer a peril to community and residents can walk in the streets or unwind in their private
houses
more safety.
On the other hand
, I consider that
education
also
plays a complementary role to
reduce
the crime level.
Firstly
, youngsters should
be taught
about features of the law which influence on their
lives
. Having a wide range of knowledge about legislation, those youngsters are finer prepared to
keep
away from situations which may involve them in offense or becoming a victim.
For example
, students
must
learn the essential laws about driving or road safety.
Secondly
, behind prison-bars,
education
programmes
must
aim to provide prisoners with
skills
and qualifications to find work and reintegrate back into society when they
are released
.
In conclusion
, I believe that prison sentences are one crucial weapon in the fight against crime, and I disagree that providing better
education
sole is more effective solution to decrease the crime rate.