‘Presentation is better than cure’ and that’s why more money from health budget should be spent on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness. Therefore it is wise to spend more money to prevent illness than to spend on curing people who are already ill.
In recent years, many countries have made a decision to spend a large proportion of money on disease prevention rather than the treatment of current patients. Yet, there remains some disagreement as to whether this strategy has been positive or negative. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, I personally believe that more money should spend on prevention than treatment. There are two primary reasons for this.
First of all, it is an indisputable fact that infection diseases are spreading fast. Consequently, tackling this problem is difficult without stopping the source of disease. For instance, some countries from West Africa have suffered from Ebola since last year. Despite the numerous of medicine and money that came from deferent countries and organisation most of the patients died. Thus, promoting the healthy lifestyle might be the best way to solve this situation. In other words, making vaccination will help countries to deal with many diseases.
Further and even more importantly, though, low level of health education and lack of exercises are responsible for such ailments as high blood pressure, obesity and heart diseases. However, by spending money to increase the level of understanding health problems in society can reduce the morbidity rate. Moreover, the increasing number of green areas in cities may encourage people to do outdoor sports and also allow people to breathing fresh air. These activities are very important for human health.
By the way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that it would be better if more money from the health budget are spent to protect people from illness rather than treating them after they become ill.
‘Presentation is better than cure’ and that’s why more
money
from
health
budget should
be spent
on promoting a healthy lifestyle to
prevent
illness.
Therefore
it is wise to
spend
more
money
to
prevent
illness than to
spend
on curing
people
who are already ill.
In recent years,
many
countries
have made a decision to
spend
a large proportion of
money
on
disease
prevention
rather
than the treatment of
current
patients.
Yet
, there remains
some
disagreement
as to whether
this strategy has been
positive
or
negative
. While there are
certainly
valid arguments to the contrary, I
personally
believe that more
money
should
spend
on prevention than treatment. There are two primary reasons for this.
First of all
, it is an indisputable fact that infection
diseases
are spreading
fast
.
Consequently
, tackling this problem is difficult without stopping the source of
disease
.
For instance
,
some
countries
from West Africa have suffered from Ebola since last year. Despite
the numerous of
medicine and
money
that came from
deferent
countries
and
organisation
most of the patients
died
.
Thus
, promoting the healthy lifestyle might be the best way to solve this situation.
In other words
, making vaccination will
help
countries
to deal with
many
diseases.
Further
and even more
importantly
, though, low level of
health
education and lack of exercises are responsible for such ailments as high blood pressure, obesity and heart
diseases
.
However
, by spending
money
to increase the level of understanding
health
problems in society can
reduce
the morbidity rate.
Moreover
, the increasing number of green areas in cities may encourage
people
to do outdoor sports and
also
allow
people
to
breathing
fresh air. These activities are
very
important
for human health.
By the way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that it would be better if more
money
from the
health
budget
are spent
to protect
people
from illness
rather
than treating them after they become ill.
17Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
27Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes