The Personal lives of political office holders should not be publicized. I believe very much that their privacy should be kept from the media.
Firstly, I believe that their private lives should be respected because exposing their personal lives to the media will make people to be critical of them. For example, publishing an expensive car a public official drive. This may result into negative reactions from the public; who may consider their lifestyles to be extravagant, which could distract them from serving the people as they will spend a lot of time trying to defend themselves.
Secondly, Exposing their privacy in the tabloids could constitute a security risk to them and their families. For instance, many people believe that public officers are wealthy, either through legitimate means of by stealing public funds. This may put them and their families at greater risks of being attacked or kidnapped for ransoms. If this happens, it destabilises their emotions and they are not able to deliver.
Lastly, exposing what public servants do outside their official duties could open them up to vain glory which may make some of them struggle to keep up with public expectations thus leading to poor performance in office. E. g. A government officer that is seen as classy and trendy in his dressing may make it a duty to always look good because of what the reactions of the public may be if he dresses shabbily. This may shift the focus of the official from the original expectation
In conclusion, I strongly concur that the privacy of political office holders should be treated with dignity as they are humans and they deserve some respect. In Addition, I reason that government officials are entitled to their space and what they do with their lives outside their official duties should not be publicized as this may be a source of distraction for them thus resulting in performances below expectations.
The Personal
lives
of political office holders should not
be publicized
. I believe
very
much that their privacy should be
kept
from the media.
Firstly
, I believe that their private
lives
should
be respected
because
exposing their personal
lives
to the media will
make
people
to be critical of them.
For example
, publishing an expensive car a
public
official
drive. This may result into
negative
reactions from the
public
; who may consider their lifestyles to be extravagant, which could distract them from serving the
people
as they will spend
a lot of
time trying to defend themselves.
Secondly
, Exposing their privacy in the tabloids could constitute a security
risk
to them and their families.
For instance
,
many
people
believe that
public
officers are wealthy, either through legitimate means of by stealing
public
funds. This may put them and their families at greater
risks
of
being attacked
or kidnapped for ransoms. If this happens, it
destabilises
their
emotions and
they are not able to deliver.
Lastly
, exposing what
public
servants do outside their
official
duties could open them up to vain glory which may
make
some
of them struggle to
keep
up with
public
expectations
thus
leading to poor performance in office.
E. g.
A
government
officer
that is
seen
as classy and trendy in his dressing may
make
it a duty to always look
good
because
of what the reactions of the
public
may be if he dresses
shabbily
. This may shift the focus of the
official
from the original
expectation
In conclusion
, I
strongly
concur that the privacy of political office holders should
be treated
with dignity as they are
humans and
they deserve
some
respect.
In Addition
, I reason that
government
officials
are entitled
to their space and what they do with their
lives
outside their
official
duties should not
be publicized
as this may be a source of distraction for them
thus
resulting in performances below expectations.