Although it is becoming a popular opinion that animals should not be used by individual, and that they should possess the same right as a person. Some people believe that employing wildlife for the satisfaction of their plethora needs such as feeding and conducting researches is a must. In my opinion, I agree that animals can be used by humans to their satisfaction; hence, this essay will discuss both views.
Proponents of the view that animals should be used for human satisfaction believe so, because it has been the norm for centuries. This means that our forefathers had always made use of animals for food, as they are a great source of protein, which is an essential nutrient require by humans, to stay healthy. To illustrate, ancestors were mainly hunters by profession, they hunted animals as a source of food and livelihood; thus, they passed-on these practices to their generations.
Secondly, using animals, for conducting an experiment is better, as this means a reduction of threats to human beings. In other words, if animals are used to carry out researches, there will be a decline in their population, which also means a reduction of life threatening species. For instance, the frequent use of monkeys to conduct experiment has resulted in the decline of their population; consequently, decline in monkey related diseases.
Opponents of the view argue that animals should not be exploited and reserve some rights as they are living things just as humans. This is because they display some similar characteristics as human beings; thus, they should be treated fairly. In addition, the have emotional feeling and as such can get hurt, therefore people should show empathy to them.
In summary, despite the opinion of others that animals should not be exploited on as they are living things and possess emotional feelings, I believe that using animals for our personal pleasure has been a lifetime practice which should be upheld, and would eliminate the threat.
Although it is becoming a popular opinion that
animals
should not be
used
by individual, and that they should possess the same right as a person.
Some
people
believe that employing wildlife for the satisfaction of their plethora needs such as feeding and conducting researches is a
must
. In my opinion, I
agree
that
animals
can be
used
by
humans
to their satisfaction;
hence
, this essay will discuss both views.
Proponents of the view that
animals
should be
used
for
human
satisfaction believe
so
,
because
it has been the norm for centuries. This means that our forefathers had always made
use
of
animals
for food, as they are a great source of protein, which is an essential nutrient require by
humans
, to stay healthy. To illustrate, ancestors were
mainly
hunters by profession, they hunted
animals
as a source of food and livelihood;
thus
, they passed-on these practices to their generations.
Secondly
, using
animals
, for conducting an experiment is better, as this means a reduction of threats to
human
beings.
In other words
, if
animals
are
used
to carry out researches, there will be a decline in their population, which
also
means a reduction of life threatening species.
For instance
, the frequent
use
of monkeys to conduct experiment has resulted in the decline of their population;
consequently
, decline in monkey related diseases.
Opponents of the view argue that
animals
should not
be exploited
and reserve
some
rights as they are living things
just
as
humans
. This is
because
they display
some
similar characteristics as
human
beings;
thus
, they should
be treated
fairly
.
In addition
, the have emotional feeling and as such can
get
hurt,
therefore
people
should
show
empathy to them.
In summary, despite the opinion of others that
animals
should not
be exploited
on as they are living things and possess emotional feelings, I believe that using
animals
for our personal pleasure has been a lifetime practice which should
be upheld
, and would eliminate the threat.