Currently, urban dwellers need to deal with numerous issues. From my perspective, these problems are mostly manifested in housing and traffic aspects, governments should use counter-urbanization as a measure to ease the mentioned problems.
Living in large cities, people are faced with housing and traffic problems daily. To start with, the incessant flow of migrants to metropolises has made the demand far exceed the supply, leading to a negative increase in property prices and a severe lack of accommodation. It has also caused the formation of slums for homeless people, bringing insecurity and diseases. Another existing issue prevalent among large cities is the failure to accommodate an ever-increasing volume of traffic. This is compounded by the fact that a majority of people prefer privately owning vehicles because they are more comfortable and flexible for doing multiple tasks than public transit. It results in endless daily gridlock, a scene usually witnessed on Los Angeles streets at 5 PM.
To tackle both these issues, governments should promote the migration from urban areas to rural ones to not only reduce the problems in big cities but also provides the citizens with higher job opportunities. The lower population density, the lower similarly commuting demand and accommodation burden. Additionally, it is undeniable that many small towns are underdeveloped due to labour scarcity. Therefore, more people move to these towns could balance the employment rate and contribute to the development of the regional economy. For example, Australia has succeeded in a redistribution program to reduce congestion and pollution problems. This program gave chances for companies to set up in country towns and created many employment possibilities for its citizens.
In conclusion, people living in large cities could confront troubles with traffic, accommodation and some associated issues. Thus, governments should support the movement of people to smaller towns or rural areas.
Currently
, urban dwellers need to deal with numerous
issues
. From my perspective, these
problems
are
mostly
manifested in housing and
traffic
aspects,
governments
should
use
counter-urbanization as a measure to
ease
the mentioned problems.
Living in large
cities
,
people
are faced
with housing and
traffic
problems
daily. To
start
with, the incessant flow of migrants to metropolises has made the demand far exceed the supply, leading to a
negative
increase in property prices and a severe lack of accommodation. It has
also
caused the formation of slums for homeless
people
, bringing insecurity and diseases. Another existing
issue
prevalent among large
cities
is the failure to accommodate an ever-increasing volume of
traffic
. This
is compounded
by the fact that a majority of
people
prefer
privately
owning vehicles
because
they are more comfortable and flexible for doing multiple tasks than public transit. It results in endless daily gridlock, a scene
usually
witnessed on Los Angeles streets at 5 PM.
To tackle both these
issues
,
governments
should promote the migration from urban areas to rural ones to not
only
reduce
the
problems
in
big
cities
but
also
provides the citizens with higher job opportunities. The lower population density, the lower
similarly
commuting demand and accommodation burden.
Additionally
, it is undeniable that
many
small
towns
are underdeveloped
due to
labour
scarcity.
Therefore
, more
people
move
to these
towns
could balance the employment rate and contribute to the development of the regional economy.
For example
, Australia has succeeded in a redistribution program to
reduce
congestion and pollution
problems
. This program gave chances for
companies
to set up in country
towns
and created
many
employment possibilities for its citizens.
In conclusion
,
people
living in large
cities
could confront troubles with
traffic
, accommodation and
some
associated
issues
.
Thus
,
governments
should support the movement of
people
to smaller
towns
or rural areas.