Parent often give children everything they ask for and do what they like. Is it good for children? What are the consequences when they grow up? v.1
Parent often give children everything they ask for and do what they like. Is it good for children? What are the consequences when they grow up? v. 1
It is argued that countries should allocate more funds on education than on leisure and competitive games. In my opinion, I firmly agree with this notion because quality education is largely favourable to a country’s economy as well as the society.
To begin with, investment in the learning system of a country is the key to its economic progression. In other words, with better levels of education, the workforce would be enriched with better skills and high productivity, which inevitably aids in fostering economic growth. For instance, as per a study conducted by the University of Queensland, the high level of economic growth in the USA is linked with larger budget allocation on enhancing schools and universities. Admittedly, sports and play are also important for people, but education is the most important in fostering economic growth.
Further, quality education contributes to the social well- being as well. Well educated people are more aware of social evils such as drugs and tend to stay away from being addicted, which undeniably contribute to create a better society. To illustrate, Singapore is ranked top in quality education, which has directly related in producing a remarkable low rate of drug addiction in comparison with the peer countries. Despite the above, sports teaches moral qualities, which helps to foster social well-being. However, in my opinion, countries would not be able harness such benefits, if the citizens are uneducated and in poverty.
To conclude, although there are contradicting arguments on the administrative fund allocation, I believe the most viable option is to focus on education since it brings many economic and social benefits for a nation.
It
is argued
that
countries
should allocate more funds on
education
than on leisure and competitive games. In my opinion, I
firmly
agree
with this notion
because
quality
education
is
largely
favourable
to a
country’s
economy as
well
as the society.
To
begin
with, investment in the learning system of a
country
is the key to its
economic
progression.
In other words
, with better levels of
education
, the workforce would
be enriched
with better
skills
and high productivity, which
inevitably
aids in fostering
economic
growth.
For instance
, as per a study conducted by the University of Queensland, the high level of
economic
growth in the USA
is linked
with larger budget allocation on enhancing schools and universities.
Admittedly
, sports and play are
also
important
for
people
,
but
education
is the most
important
in fostering
economic
growth.
Further
,
quality
education
contributes to the
social
well-
being as
well
.
Well educated
people
are more aware of
social
evils such as drugs and tend to stay away from
being addicted
, which
undeniably
contribute to create a better society. To illustrate, Singapore
is ranked
top in
quality
education
, which has
directly
related in producing a remarkable low rate of drug addiction
in comparison
with the peer
countries
. Despite the above, sports teaches moral
qualities
, which
helps
to foster
social
well-being.
However
, in my opinion,
countries
would not be
able harness
such benefits, if the citizens
are uneducated
and in poverty.
To conclude
, although there are contradicting arguments on the administrative fund allocation, I believe the most viable option is to focus on
education
since it brings
many
economic
and
social
benefits for a nation.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes