Museums have been one of the most pivotal places to learn about a certain field. Today, many museums operate entertaining facilities for visitors to enjoy. The argument that museums should merely be a place of education, is both supported and refuted by many. This essay will discuss both points before giving a conclusion.
To begin with, amusement areas at museums can attract a diverse audience especially children. A survey done by a National Education Institute plays a good example here. It suggests that few students feel motivated to learn at a traditional classroom setting. Instead, learning through games and kinesthetic activities can boost their interest. This is applicable in this argument too, providing some leisure activities at museums can enhance learning outcomes, and captivate children’s attention. This explains why museums should also be entertaining.
On the other side of the argument, the most common purpose of visiting a museum is for education. For instance, people visit art galleries for sketching, or history museums to collect some relevant data for their study. Hence studying at a museum that has many entertainment facilities can be destructive. Owing to the fact that these places can be noisy as the children play, and people speak loudly. Consequently it can detract the concept of studying quietly. Thus the viewpoint that a museum should be a place of education is justified.
To conclude, both sides of the argument that museums should be a place of learning have strong reason. However after discussing their points, there seem to be more advantages if museums provided some entertaining activities. Such type of exhibitions are believed to become a mainstream in the foreseeable future.
Museums
have been one of the most pivotal
places
to learn about a certain field.
Today
,
many
museums
operate entertaining facilities for visitors to enjoy. The
argument
that
museums
should
merely
be a
place
of
education
, is both supported and refuted by
many
. This essay will discuss both points
before
giving a conclusion.
To
begin
with, amusement areas at
museums
can attract a diverse audience
especially
children. A survey done by a National
Education
Institute plays a
good
example here. It suggests that few students feel motivated to learn at a traditional classroom setting.
Instead
, learning through games and kinesthetic activities can boost their interest. This is applicable in this
argument
too, providing
some
leisure activities at
museums
can enhance learning outcomes, and captivate children’s attention. This
explains
why
museums
should
also
be entertaining.
On the other side of the
argument
, the most common purpose of visiting a
museum
is for
education
.
For instance
,
people
visit art galleries for sketching, or history
museums
to collect
some
relevant data for their study.
Hence
studying at a
museum
that has
many
entertainment facilities can be destructive. Owing to the fact that these
places
can be noisy as the children play, and
people
speak
loudly
.
Consequently
it can detract the concept of studying
quietly
.
Thus
the viewpoint that a
museum
should be a
place
of
education
is justified
.
To conclude
, both sides of the
argument
that
museums
should be a
place
of learning
have
strong reason.
However
after discussing their points, there seem to be more advantages if
museums
provided
some
entertaining activities. Such type of exhibitions
are believed
to become a mainstream in the foreseeable future.