Education is the most powerful weapon which we can use to change the world. However, one of the most controversial issue today relates to education. People think that children should learn history in schools while, others believe that, learning modern subjects are much better to run on a progressive track thesedays. In this essay, i will explore the dimensions of this topic and shape up my opinion on the behalf of both point of views.
First step is to understand, why some people think that children should learn history in schools? Broadly speaking, the prominent reason for believing this is knowledge. It not only imparts our knowledge about our ancestors, it also teach us about the culture of a society. Secondly, french history is crucial to understand about the french food, language, manners, and ethiquattes which shows the difference that french people are different from germans and Britishers. Particularly, the best epitome of this is that the recent survey had been conducted by the Hindustan Times which illustrates that 7 outoff 10 students were interested in learning history.
On the other hand, the opposing group of people argue that learning modern subjects such as science, mathematics, accounting management is vital for developing a strong carrer. Modern business need professionals who are proficient in science and other subjects as well. They do not need employees who have a background in history. For example, hospitals, automobile companies, businesses construction need doctos, civil engineers, mechanical engineers respectively. There is no space for historians. Thus, to earn sufficient money for a comfortable life. Children should learn science subjects.
To conclude, children should learn both history and modern subjects because, history inculcate us knowledge about our culture and moral ethics, it cannot give us a respectable living. Modern subjects, on the other hand, can secure a carrer but not create a roots that from the cultural identity.
Education is the most powerful weapon which we can
use
to
change
the world.
However
, one of the most controversial issue
today
relates to education.
People
think
that
children
should
learn
history
in schools while, others believe that, learning
modern
subjects
are much better to run on a progressive
track
thesedays
. In this essay,
i
will explore the dimensions of this topic and shape up my opinion on the behalf of both point of views.
First
step is to understand, why
some
people
think
that
children
should
learn
history
in schools?
Broadly
speaking, the prominent reason for believing this is knowledge. It not
only
imparts our knowledge about our ancestors, it
also
teach
us about the culture of a society.
Secondly
, french
history
is crucial to understand about the
french
food, language, manners, and
ethiquattes
which
shows
the difference that
french
people
are
different
from
germans
and Britishers.
Particularly
, the best epitome of this is that the recent survey had
been conducted
by the Hindustan Times which illustrates that 7
outoff
10 students
were interested
in learning history.
On the
other
hand, the opposing group of
people
argue that learning
modern
subjects
such as science, mathematics, accounting management is vital for developing a strong
carrer
.
Modern
business need professionals who are proficient in science and
other
subjects
as well
. They do not need employees who have a background in
history
.
For example
, hospitals, automobile
companies
, businesses construction need
doctos
, civil engineers, mechanical engineers
respectively
. There is no space for historians.
Thus
, to earn sufficient money for a comfortable life.
Children
should
learn
science subjects.
To conclude
,
children
should
learn
both
history
and
modern
subjects
because
,
history
inculcate us knowledge about our culture and moral ethics, it cannot give us a respectable living.
Modern
subjects
, on the
other
hand, can secure a
carrer
but
not create
a roots
that from the cultural identity.