Many people claimed that nowadays, parents of children preserve their children more carefully than in the past. Individually, I disagree with this point of view because it depends on many aspects.
For a variety of reasons, I think it might be misunderstood to completely believe that children have much more protection than previously. On the one hand, in recent years, the elders, or parents had started to become more and more unregarded with their offspring because they were swept along with jobs which finally lead to create an invisible distance between family members. In some families, misused electronic devices, especially smartphones have influence terribly and its effect will maintain as long as they don't recognize the problem. After all, it will lead to a lackadaisical family and the victims who have the most effect will be their children. Take the US as an example, although it is a developed and high-educated country with many strict and forceful laws to protect and affirm their interests, there are still many cases reported that a few children do not have enough guardianships and make them often feel desolate. In some worse predicaments, they might nurse a complex about their situation, creating many obstacles integrating into society.
Furthermore, many experimental results illustrate the number of family suppers, which is an essential method to build up connections and conservations between family members, especially youngster, has decreased exponentially over many recent centuries. The less connection a family has, the more deserted it gain and until a while, that family would break down and their adolescents will grow up in an aberrant way which will create lots of obstacles for them. Finally, I believe that many infants who live in this period don't completely have much more stability because it depends a lot on society and family.
In conclusion, toddlers are the most impressionable generations which need to have full protection. We should assure and educate children most effectively.
Many
people
claimed that nowadays, parents of
children
preserve their
children
more
carefully
than in the past.
Individually
, I disagree with this point of view
because
it depends on
many
aspects.
For a variety of reasons, I
think
it might be misunderstood to completely believe that
children
have much more protection than previously. On the one hand, in recent years, the elders, or parents had
started
to become more and more
unregarded
with their offspring
because
they
were swept
along with jobs which
finally
lead to create an invisible distance between
family
members. In
some
families
, misused electronic devices,
especially
smartphones have influence
terribly
and its effect will maintain as long as they don't recognize the problem.
After all
, it will lead to a lackadaisical
family
and the victims who have the most effect will be their
children
. Take the US as an example, although it is a developed and high-educated country with
many
strict and forceful laws to protect and affirm their interests, there are
still
many
cases reported that a few
children
do not have
enough
guardianships
and
make
them
often
feel desolate. In
some
worse predicaments, they might nurse a complex about their situation, creating
many
obstacles integrating into society.
Furthermore
,
many
experimental results illustrate the number of
family
suppers, which is an essential method to build up connections and
conservations
between
family
members,
especially
youngster, has decreased
exponentially
over
many
recent centuries. The less connection a
family
has, the more deserted it gain and until a while, that
family
would break down and their adolescents will grow up
in an aberrant way
which will create lots of obstacles for them.
Finally
, I believe that
many
infants who
live
in this period don't completely have much more stability
because
it depends a lot on society and family.
In conclusion
, toddlers are the most impressionable generations which need to have full protection. We should assure and educate
children
most
effectively
.