Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

• Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. v.4

• Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of them because of their benefits to humanity. v. 4
In the today’s world, there is an increasingly popular tendency that animals are used as the experiment objects for new medicines and other products testing. While some people are of the opinion that those experiments should be prohibited as it violates animal right and is immortal, some still hold the belief that animal testing should be maintained due to its benefits to human’s life. From my perspective, I find the former agreeable for several reasons. On the one hand, some people have their points to against animal testing. The first reason worth mentioning is the fact that a medicine passed the safety test on animal does not mean that it is one hundred percent safe for humans to use. It is obvious that each species has its own characteristics and gene; therefore, different reactions on a specific medicine will be likely to happen. The second argument is that animal testing is clearly cruel and dramatically violates animal rights. To be more specific, in most of the experiments, not only do animal have to suffer a deadly pain, but they are also often killed. Another reason supporting a ban on animal testing is that it is costly to do experiments on animals, as it involves huge investments in state-of-the-art equipment, specialized laboratories, security and training cost for specialists. Clearly, creating an artificial body to do the tests on and developing Artificial Intelligent to analysis and evaluate the effectiveness and safety of new medicines seem to be better choices in long-term. On the other hand, it is reasonable to believe that animal testing should be maintained, due to its advantages. First of all, it is undeniable that all medicines should be tested for side effects and safety reasons. In fact, at the present, doing experiments on animals is the only way to ensure that medicines are safe for humans to use. Secondly, humans should be prioritized over animals. Specifically, it is absolutely better for an animal to suffer, rather than a human to die, for the life-saving purpose. Last but not least, animal testing can help scientists and doctors find new treatments or ways to save lives. For instance, by doing a lot of experiments on bats and rats, specialists were successful in developing a vaccine to effectively prevent humans from Ebola which killed millions of African people in 2015. In conclusion, although it is immortal and expensive to do animal testing, medical experiments on animals for the safety and life-saving purposes should be kept running due to its irrefutable benefits to humanity.
In the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
today
’s world, there is an
increasingly
popular tendency that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
as the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiment
objects for new medicines and other products
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
. While
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
are of the opinion that those
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiments
should
be prohibited
as it violates
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
right and is immortal,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
still
hold the belief that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
should
be maintained
due to its benefits to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human’s
life. From my perspective, I find the former agreeable for several reasons.

On the one hand,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
have their points to against
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
. The
first
reason worth mentioning is the fact that a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
medicine
passed the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
safety
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
test
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
does not mean that it is one hundred percent safe for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
. It is obvious that each species has its
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
characteristics and gene;
therefore
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
reactions on a specific
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
medicine
will be likely to happen. The second argument is that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
is
clearly
cruel and
dramatically
violates
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
rights. To be more specific, in most of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiments
, not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
do
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
suffer a deadly pain,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
they are
also
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
killed. Another reason supporting a ban on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
is that it is costly to do
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiments
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
, as it involves huge investments in state-of-the-art equipment, specialized laboratories, security and training cost for specialists.
Clearly
, creating an artificial body to do the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tests
on and developing Artificial Intelligent to analysis and evaluate the effectiveness and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
safety
of new medicines seem to be better choices in long-term.

On the other hand
, it is reasonable to believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
should
be maintained
, due to its advantages.
This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".
First of all
, it is undeniable that all medicines should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tested
for side effects and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
safety
reasons. In fact, at the present, doing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiments
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
is the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
way to ensure that medicines are safe for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
.
Secondly
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
should
be prioritized
over
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
.
Specifically
, it is
absolutely
better for an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
to suffer,
rather
than a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
die
, for the life-saving purpose. Last
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
not least,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
scientists and doctors find new treatments or ways to save
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
.
For instance
, by doing
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
a lot of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiments
on bats and rats, specialists were successful in developing a vaccine to
effectively
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
prevent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
from Ebola which killed millions of African
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
in 2015.

In conclusion
, although it is immortal and expensive to do
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
, medical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiments
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
safety
and life-saving purposes should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
kept
running due to its irrefutable benefits to humanity.
15Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
44Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes

IELTS essay • Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of them because of their benefits to humanity. v. 4

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
421 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts