Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Nowadays animal experiments are widely use to develop new medicine and to test the safety of other products. Many people argue that these should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animal to suffer from, while others are in favour of them as they bring move benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your opinion. v.2

Nowadays animal experiments are widely use to develop new medicine and to test the safety of other products. Many people argue that these should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animal to suffer from, while others are in favour of them as they bring move benefits to humanity. v. 2
Some people believe that animal experimentations which exert positive impacts upon new medicines enhancement and testing the safety of other commodity should put a ban on by the authorities. While I tend towards the viewpoint that governments should apply the prohibition policy on researching on animals, I am still in agreement a limited amount with researches for the sake of medical. On the one hand, there has been a dramatic increase in ethical arguments against the use of creatures for testing. Firstly, the benefits of testing animals do not justify the suffering caused as they respond almost the same as people do such as crying as well as screaming. Therefore, scientists should find other suitable alternative methods to replace this way. Secondly, these tests violate their basic rights because we subject animals to such kinds of trauma that no one can suffer from. Thus, the lives of animals should be respected. On the other hand, I personally think that animal experimentations in terms of medical still can be utilized if scientists and researchers know how to take advantage of them. It cannot be denied that this method stands higher chances of advancing medical knowledge. To be more specific, many important medical breakthroughs involved experimentations on creatures. Furthermore, human lives have more intrinsic values than animals. Supporters reckon that a certain amount of suffering on mice and rats can be justified if human’s lives are saved. Taking an example of an opponent who needs products from animal testings, he or she is likely to experience a different feeling from their first thoughts. In conclusion, it would be wrong to prohibit animal over exploitation until people find out equally effective methods.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
Possible spelling mistake found.
experimentations
which exert
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
positive
impacts upon new medicines enhancement and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
the safety of other commodity should put a ban on by the authorities. While I tend towards the viewpoint that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
should apply the prohibition policy on researching on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
, I am
still
in agreement a limited amount with researches for the sake of medical.

On the one hand, there has been a dramatic increase in ethical arguments against the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of creatures for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
.
Firstly
, the benefits of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
do not justify the suffering caused as they respond almost the same as
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
do such as crying
as well
as screaming.
Therefore
, scientists should find other suitable alternative methods to replace this way.
Secondly
, these
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tests
violate their basic rights
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
we subject
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
to such kinds of trauma that no one can suffer from.
Thus
, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
should
be respected
.

On the other hand
, I
personally
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
Possible spelling mistake found.
experimentations
in terms of medical
still
can
be utilized
if scientists and researchers know how to take advantage of them. It cannot
be denied
that this method stands higher chances of advancing medical knowledge. To be more specific,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
medical breakthroughs involved
Possible spelling mistake found.
experimentations on
creatures.
Furthermore
, human
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
have more intrinsic values than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
. Supporters reckon that a certain amount of suffering on mice and rats can
be justified
if human’s
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
are saved
. Taking an example of an opponent who needs products from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testings
, he or she is likely to experience a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
feeling from their
first
thoughts.

In conclusion
, it would be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
wrong
to prohibit
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
over exploitation until
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
find out
equally
effective methods.
8.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8.5Mistakes

IELTS essay Nowadays animal experiments are widely use to develop new medicine and to test the safety of other products. Many people argue that these should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animal to suffer from, while others are in favour of them as they bring move benefits to humanity. v. 2

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
279 words
8.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 8.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 8.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 8.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 8.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts