A number of people think that the government spend money to construct new public buildings like museums and town halls instead of the restoration of the existing buildings. I completely disagree with this view, and I believe that building new buildings would be a waste of money as well as the loss of the value of cultural of old buildings.
First of all, it can be thought that creating new cultural buildings is a modern understanding. However, the idea requires a large sum of money while the existing buildings are functioning properly. For example, building modern facilities is costlier than renovating the present buildings. Moreover, the money spent in the construction of modern facilities can be used for other improvements such as improving sports facilities or poor transport system. Therefore, the national budget is just a waste of money.
Secondly, old buildings, which have a rich history, have become a part of the culture, and many tourists prefer to visit these buildings over modern ones in order to experience a sense of history and past. An effective restoration policy would boost the tourism industry as well as renovating them. To illustrate, if the government restores these architectures, the number of visitors can increase in the long run. Furthermore, the likelihood of this trend can contribute the national budget to increase. Thus, it would be a justified idea that there is a strong relationship between the restoration policy and the development of the tourism industry.
In conclusion, a handful of people believe that the government invest money in creating new buildings rather than constructing restoring old ones. I fully disagree with this idea because of the reason of that creating a modern building is costly, and it harms the cultural value of old architectures. In my opinion, the restoration would be a greater practice.
A number of
people
think
that the
government
spend
money
to construct
new
public
buildings
like museums and town halls
instead
of the
restoration
of the existing
buildings
. I completely disagree with this view, and I believe that
building
new
buildings
would be a waste of
money
as well
as the loss of the value of cultural of
old
buildings.
First of all
, it can be
thought
that creating
new
cultural
buildings
is a
modern
understanding.
However
, the
idea
requires a large sum of
money
while the existing
buildings
are functioning
properly
.
For example
,
building
modern
facilities is costlier than renovating the present
buildings
.
Moreover
, the
money
spent in the construction of
modern
facilities can be
used
for other improvements such as improving sports facilities or poor transport system.
Therefore
, the national budget is
just
a waste of money.
Secondly
,
old
buildings
, which have a rich history, have become a part of the culture, and
many
tourists prefer to visit these
buildings
over
modern
ones in order to experience a sense of history and past. An effective
restoration
policy would boost the tourism industry
as well
as renovating them. To illustrate, if the
government
restores these architectures, the number of visitors can increase in the long run.
Furthermore
, the likelihood of this trend can contribute the national budget to increase.
Thus
, it would be a justified
idea
that there is a strong relationship between the
restoration
policy and the development of the tourism industry.
In conclusion
, a handful of
people
believe that the
government
invest
money
in creating
new
buildings
rather
than constructing restoring
old
ones. I
fully
disagree with this
idea
because
of the reason of that creating a
modern
building
is costly, and it harms the cultural value of
old
architectures. In my opinion, the
restoration
would be a greater practice.